next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
e.g. record shots of a bird. If people are going to buy a higher end P&S, I would recommend no more than 7 mpx - preferably 5. You can get excellent 5 X 7 and acceptable 10 X 8 prints from these. However, it's harder to get a decent crop, to, say, enlarge a bird in the center of an image, so as with all things technical, there are compromises to be made. The other thing beginners might be drawn into with P&Ss is digital zoom. Unfortunately this enlarges every pixel, and so makes the image look fuzzy and pixelated. The only zoom that counts is O
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C839E7.4CE42D70
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Richard, and all,
All good points, it is great to have a forum for these issues. Just =
thought I would throw that option out there in case it might fit =
someone's needs. It is a good thing that DSLR's prices are falling to =
the point that consumers can get a good rig at an affordable price. =
Photography/Birding is very rewarding,
cheers,
Gary.
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Richard Stern=20
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca=20
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Good Digital Camera Question form Santa
Hi again,
There are all kinds of point and shoots that make great images, =
including the Canon G9, Nikon P5100, Sony DSC-W5 that I have, and the =
Sony DSC-H5 with a 28-460mm. 35mm. equivalent optical zoom that I also =
have, and whole lines of cameras made by Canon, Nikon, Panasonic, =
Pentax, Olympus, Kodak etc. etc. None of them are as versatile as dSLRs =
in many ways, and at extremes of photography ( e.g. faraway birds etc.) =
are not as good. On the other hand, there are much smaller. lighter, can =
do short videos, and easy to stick in a pocket - as well as being =
cheaper (although the better P & Ss are not much cheaper than the =
entry-level dSLRs. Gary - of course you know all that stuff, but there =
are probably others on NatureNS who don't, and hence this reply. The =
original question from Jamie was about dSLRs.=20
One of the issues with P&Ss is that packing 10 or 12 megapixels into a =
physically small sensor dramatically increses "noise", and ISO speeds of =
over 100 give poor image quality, and over 200 are usually useless =
except for, e.g. record shots of a bird. If people are going to buy a =
higher end P&S, I would recommend no more than 7 mpx - preferably 5. You =
can get excellent 5 X 7 and acceptable 10 X 8 prints from these. =
However, it's harder to get a decent crop, to, say, enlarge a bird in =
the center of an image, so as with all things technical, there are =
compromises to be made. The other thing beginners might be drawn into =
with P&Ss is digital zoom. Unfortunately this enlarges every pixel, and =
so makes the image look fuzzy and pixelated. The only zoom that counts =
is Optical zoom - which acts like a telephoto lens without enlarging =
every pixel.=20
Anyone contemplating buying any digital camera these days would be =
well advised to look at www.dpreview.com, and read the detailed reviews =
of the ones he/ she is considering, especially in the conclusions page - =
the pros, cons, and comparison to the nearest rival.=20
Good birding/ shooting!
Richard
On Dec 8, 2007 6:27 PM, Gary Murray <garymurray@ns.sympatico.ca> =
wrote:
Hi,
I recently read that the Canon G9 12MP P&S makes great images. I've =
attatched a link below of a review by noted Cdn Photographer Darwin =
Wiggett.
Hopefully it will open,
http://www.naturephotographers.net/articles1207/dw1207-1.html=20
Cheers,
Gary Murray
Bedford NS
http://garyamurray.blogspot.com/
http://www.pbase.com/pgns/gmurray
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Jamie Simpson=20
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca=20
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Good Digital Camera Question form Santa
Thanks Richard, he did mention the Canon so I may go with that, =
appreciate the response, peace to all.
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Richard Stern=20
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca=20
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Good Digital Camera Question form Santa
Hi,
The 3 main contenders for an entry level dSLR (digital =
equivalent of 35mm. in film) would be the Canon Rebel XTi, the Nikon =
D40x, or the Pentax K10. They're all around 10mpx, and the Canon seems =
to be the cheapest. The advantage of the Pentax are that it has =
vibration reduction built into the body, and it's backwardly compatible =
with old Pentax film camera lenses. They all come as a body only, or =
bundled with a "kit" lens, which is generally an 18-55mm. zoom. They =
have similar specs. They all feel a bit different, but should produce =
excellent photos, so the best bet would to go to a store (? Carsand =
Mosher, or Camera Corner in New Minas) and play with all 3. Also, read =
the reviews on dpReview.com.
Richard
On Dec 6, 2007 7:42 PM, Jamie Simpson <jsimpson@win.eastlink.ca> =
wrote:
You've probably answered this 100 times but I'm looking for a =
good digital
camera for my son who has an interest in photography - what is =
a good deal
on an entry level 35mm digital camera?
Santa
--=20
#################
Richard Stern,=20
317 Middle Dyke Rd.
Port Williams, NS, Canada
B0P 1T0
rbstern@ns.sympatico.ca
rbstern@xcountry.tv
sternrichard@gmail.com
###################=20
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.=20
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.14/1171 - Release =
Date: 12/4/2007 7:31 PM
--=20
#################
Richard Stern,=20
317 Middle Dyke Rd.
Port Williams, NS, Canada
B0P 1T0
rbstern@ns.sympatico.ca=20
rbstern@xcountry.tv
sternrichard@gmail.com
###################
------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C839E7.4CE42D70
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.165