next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
what the criteria should be for determining what is the truth.&nbsp
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01CC4CA7.C52EF4A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Andy has called this situation accurately, clearly and concisely. =
Fishermen know their working environment better than anybody.
Gloria
Original Message---=20
From: Andy Moir/Christine Callaghan=20
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca=20
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Cougars and Ivory-billed woodpeckers
I am afraid I don't hold the scientific community in the same high =
esteem that Richard does. In fact, I believe segments of the scientific =
community have a growing credibility problem.=20
In our efforts on some environmental issues here on the Neck and =
Islands, we have come up against all sorts of scientists who interpret =
"facts" to suit the wishes of their political or business masters. =20
A recent example came from DFO scientists who told a crowd in =
Shelburne that there is no scientific evidence to show that open net =
salmon farms do damage to the local lobster population. They made it =
sound as if they had actually studied the issue. But of course, they =
haven't...they have quite intentionally not studied it, presumably for =
fear of what they might find. When government scientists make this sort =
of claim, I ask myself, where is the test of a "high degree of proof" =
that Richard refers to in his note. =20
The people who have studied it, the lobstermen of NB, who have 20 =
years or more experience of seeing their livelihood destroyed by open =
net fish farms, don't have PhD after their names, so their observations =
are dismissed, often by scientists. In many cases, I'll take local =
knowledge over the political/scientific agenda of those who are paid to =
provide advice that the politicians want to hear. All too often, the =
science has been tainted to reflect a reality that has more to do with =
creating jobs and making money than accurately or fairly assessing the =
environmental impact of some of these projects.
So I think the scientific community has a long way to go to clean up =
its act before it can rightly claim any holier than thou attitude about =
who is right, and who is wrong on these issues, or, if fact, what the =
criteria should be for determining what is the truth. =20
Andy in Freeport
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Richard Stern=20
To: NatureNS=20
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 7:48 PM
Subject: [NatureNS] Cougars and Ivory-billed woodpeckers
Hi,
I'll weigh in on the interesting thread about E.cougars, elephants =
etc., mainly because I enjoy this kind of debate. Wild cougars (or =
Eskimo curlews, or Coelocanths etc.) may or may not be present in NS, =
and people can believe whatever they want. But I agree with Ulli etc. =
that convincing the naturalist and scientific community would require a =
pretty high degree of proof - preferably independently analysed and =
corroborated photos, videos, DNA etc., and then proof beyond a =
reasonable doubt that any photos aren't faked in some way, and that the =
creature wasn't a zoo or collection escape, like Paul's elephant.=20
I would urge interested parties, and for that matter all birders and =
naturalists interested in reporting sightings, to read David Sibley's =
refutation of the "proof" that the Ivory-billed woodpecker still lives =
in Arkansas, for a great example of what to look for and how to go about =
it , and the sort of analysis that should convince skeptics on rare bird =
committees etc.! =
(http://www.sciencemag.org/content/311/5767/1555.1.full), followed by =
John Fitzpatrick's response =
(http://www.sciencemag.org/content/311/5767/1555.2.full). These are 2 =
highly respected well-known birders with multiple books and publications =
to their name, who give apparently convincing evidence to prove opposite =
"facts", neither of which has subsequently been corroborated, although =
apparently Fitzpatrick has backed down somewhat and the Cornell team =
have stopped searching till more definitive evidence is found.
Keep debating and looking!
Richard
--=20
#################
Richard Stern,=20
317 Middle Dyke Rd.
Port Williams, NS, Canada
B0P 1T0
sternrichard@gmail.com
###################
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01CC4CA7.C52EF4A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.17098" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">Andy has called this situation =
accurately,=20
clearly and concisely. Fishermen know their working environment better =
than=20
anybody.</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">Gloria</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">Original Message--- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dslickdog1@gmail.com =
href=3D"mailto:slickdog1@gmail.com">Andy=20
Moir/Christine Callaghan</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dnaturens@chebucto.ns.ca=20
href=3D"mailto:naturens@chebucto.ns.ca">naturens@chebucto.ns.ca</A> =
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 27, 2011 =
9:42=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NatureNS] Cougars =
and=20
Ivory-billed woodpeckers</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> I am afraid I don't hold the =
scientific=20
community in the same high esteem that Richard does. In fact, I=20
believe segments of the scientific community have a growing=20
credibility problem. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3