next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects I think that in picking up an injured bird and conveying it to a rehabilitation center, one set of criteria may apply. When it comes to trapping a wild bird, governed by articles in the Migratory Birds Convention Act, different criteria will apply. One may be concerned about the welfare of a bird, but there is nonetheless legislation that governs what is and is not allowed. As Tuma suggest, it would be worthwhile checking with Hope Swinimer to see whether her rehabilitation license covers such circumstances, and if not, to apply for a permit. In the interests of the welfare of a bird, its nonetheless worthwhile not to run afoul (no pun intended ;- >) of the law. Cheers, Chris On 13-Jan-12, at 11:09 AM, Hans Toom wrote: > Jim Edsell said: Has anyone sought a permit for trapping this > bird?? I believe it is protected from any kind of interference by > the Migratory Bird Act. > > Think!. Should I have sought a permit to pick up the Harlequin Duck > that was walking up Sandy Cove Road in obvious distress. To have > left the bird in distress and sought a permit would have been an act > of wonton cruelty and stupidity. By the way this bird was filled > with pellets fired by some moron with a shot gun. > > When we see a half eaten migratory bird, still alive after a raptor > attack, do we mercifully kill it or walk away leaving it to suffer > because we don't have a permit. > > Common sense applies! > > Hans > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Edsall" <jim.edsall@bellaliant.net > > > To: <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca> > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 10:47 AM > Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Vogel the Common Gallinule > > >>> >> Jim Edsall >> Dartmouth, N.S. >> check out my personal website at >> http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/jim.edsall/ >
next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects