[NatureNS] Photos of an Owl, as Seen in its Habitat

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:42:27 -0400
From: Rick Whitman <dendroica.caerulescens@gmail.com>
To: naturens <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects


--0015174757f6f34daa04b899c8b5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Even non-photographers will realize that those of us who post bird photos
on the Internet will only post our best or better photos, while discarding
dozens. Therefore, I had doubts about posting three photos yesterday
showing how a Short-eared Owl more or less disappears even when "out in the
open". I felt the photos had some merit because they do show what I see
with 10X binocs, even tho the photos are 24X.

So I was pleased that 2 individuals e-mailed me to say they had enjoyed the
photos & as owner of the site I can see that between 86 & 126 folks have
looked at those 3 photos. Of course "owls are special". But it's great to
know that quite a few can enjoy a realistic birdwatcher's view along with
the closeups that we all try to get.

For the few who don't follow NSRBA:

http://rickwhitman.smugmug.com/Nature/Birds-January-March-2012/20950511_VD8zMC#!i=1705109791&k=FL4fB7w

Some early morning thoughts--- (you won't be seeing my microscopic warblers
etc. etc.) LOL.

Rick Whitman

--0015174757f6f34daa04b899c8b5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Even non-photographers will realize that those of us who post bird photos o=
n the Internet will only post our best or better photos, while discarding d=
ozens. Therefore, I had doubts about posting three photos yesterday showing=
 how a Short-eared Owl more or less disappears even when &quot;out in the o=
pen&quot;. I felt the photos had some merit because they do show what I see=
 with 10X binocs, even tho the photos are 24X.
<div><br></div><div>So I was pleased that 2 individuals e-mailed me to say =
they had enjoyed the photos &amp; as owner of the site I can see that betwe=
en 86 &amp; 126 folks have looked at those 3 photos. Of course &quot;owls a=
re special&quot;. But it&#39;s great to know that quite a few can enjoy a r=
ealistic birdwatcher&#39;s view along with the closeups that we all try to =
get.</div>
<div><br></div><div>For the few who don&#39;t follow NSRBA:</div><div><br><=
/div><div><a href=3D"http://rickwhitman.smugmug.com/Nature/Birds-January-Ma=
rch-2012/20950511_VD8zMC#!i=3D1705109791&amp;k=3DFL4fB7w">http://rickwhitma=
n.smugmug.com/Nature/Birds-January-March-2012/20950511_VD8zMC#!i=3D17051097=
91&amp;k=3DFL4fB7w</a></div>
<div><br></div><div>Some early morning thoughts--- (you won&#39;t be seeing=
 my microscopic warblers etc. etc.) LOL.</div><div><br></div><div>Rick Whit=
man</div>

--0015174757f6f34daa04b899c8b5--

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects