[NatureNS] Cornell Lab of Ornothology Binocular Ratings

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
References: <0CBABBA97BA0428CAC97718F893C2606@hans57ff9baf63>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:26:56 -0300
From: Ronald Arsenault <rongarsenault@gmail.com>
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
--f46d043bde6693c94704bd8e96a8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hello,

Though dated and limited re the number of models, not to mention the
changes since, I agree with Hans that the Cornell review is very useful.

My choices, based upon the price categories given in the Cornell review,
are as follows:

1.  Economy:  6.5X32 Vortex Raptor (8.5X32 also available).

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Richard <sternrichard@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree with Hans. I have Zeiss FL*T s, and they are superb. I also have
> Eagle Optics Rangers which are 90% as good ( the difference being a
> narrower field of view and very slight loss of image brightness and
> sharpness if you're very critical) for 25% of the price. I recently send my
> Zeiss to be repaired and serviced - they had to be sent to Germany and it
> took 4 months. I don't think their build ( focus wheel play, rubber coating
> etc.) is as good as the Rangers.
>
> Another good source of info is eagle optics web site (www.eagleoptics.com)
> and browse the reviews and prices for all the binocs. there.
>
> Richard Stern
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 2012-04-13, at 8:04 AM, Hans Toom <htoom@hfx.eastlink.ca> wrote:
>
> There is no recent update on the attached review that I can find but it
> still exists as the best and most reliable, read unbiased, review of
> binoculars I have found.
>
> The Zeiss FL T* are the top rated as usual. I have owned and used these
> binoculars and they are indeed bright and sharp. Unfortunately, the law of
> diminishing returns kicks in and you can get 90% of the Zeiss quality at
> 10% of the cost. I sold my Zeiss FL T*'s and now use a less expensive and
> lighter pair and I am quite satisfied with my decision.
>
> The Cornell review breaks your options down into Economy, Midprice and Top
> Gun. There is no need for me to parrot their work so here it is:
> http://www.birds.cornell.edu/Publications/LivingBird/Winter2005/Age_Binos.html
>
> Hans
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Hans Toom
> Portuguese Cove, Nova Scotia, Canada
> http://www.hanstoom.com/
>
>


-- 
Ronald G. Arsenault
Moncton, N.B.

--f46d043bde6693c94704bd8e96a8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,<div><br></div><div>Though dated and limited re the number of models,=
 not to mention the changes since, I agree with Hans that the Cornell revie=
w is very useful.</div><div><br></div><div>My choices, based upon the price=
 categories given in the Cornell review, are as follows:</div>
<div><br></div><div>1. =A0Economy: =A06.5X32 Vortex Raptor (8.5X32 also ava=
ilable). =A0<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:40=
 AM, Richard <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:sternrichard@gmail.com=
">sternrichard@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"><div>I agree with H=
ans. I have Zeiss FL*T s, and they are superb. I also have Eagle Optics Ran=
gers which are 90% as good ( the difference being a narrower field of view =
and very slight loss of image brightness and sharpness if you&#39;re very c=
ritical) for 25% of the price. I recently send my Zeiss to be repaired and =
serviced - they had to be sent to Germany and it took 4 months. I don&#39;t=
 think their build ( focus wheel play, rubber coating etc.) is as good as t=
he Rangers.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Another good source of info is eagle optics web site (<=
a href=3D"http://www.eagleoptics.com" target=3D"_blank">www.eagleoptics.com=
</a>) and browse the reviews and prices for all the binocs. there.<br><br>R=
ichard Stern<div>
Sent from my iPad</div></div><div><div class=3D"h5"><div><br>On 2012-04-13,=
 at 8:04 AM, Hans Toom &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:htoom@hfx.eastlink.ca" target=
=3D"_blank">htoom@hfx.eastlink.ca</a>&gt; wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><b=
lockquote type=3D"cite">
<div>






<div><font face=3D"Arial">There is no recent update on the attached review=
=20
that I can find but it still exists as the best and most reliable, read=20
unbiased, review of binoculars I have found.</font></div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial"></font>=A0</div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial">The Zeiss FL T* are the top rated as usual. I hav=
e=20
owned and used these binoculars and they are indeed=A0bright and sharp.=20
Unfortunately, the law of diminishing returns kicks in and you can get 90% =
of=20
the Zeiss quality at 10% of the cost. I sold my Zeiss FL T*&#39;s and now u=
se a less=20
expensive and lighter pair and I am quite satisfied with my=20
decision.</font></div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial">The Cornell review breaks your options down into=
=20
Economy, Midprice and Top Gun.</font>=A0<font face=3D"Arial">There is no=20
need for me to parrot their work so here it is: </font><font face=3D"Arial"=
><a href=3D"http://www.birds.cornell.edu/Publications/LivingBird/Winter2005=
/Age_Binos.html" target=3D"_blank">http://www.birds.cornell.edu/Publication=
s/LivingBird/Winter2005/Age_Binos.html</a></font></div>

<div><font face=3D"Arial"><br>Hans<br>_____________________________________=
____________________________________________________________________<br>Han=
s=20
Toom<br>Portuguese Cove, Nova Scotia, Canada<br><a href=3D"http://www.hanst=
oom.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://www.hanstoom.com/</a></font></div>
</div></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"al=
l"><div><br></div>-- <br>Ronald G. Arsenault<br>Moncton, N.B.<br>
</div>

--f46d043bde6693c94704bd8e96a8--

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects