next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects I could not agree more with Jim. I've heard of 'closed' systems in the New England states that remain in the ocean, but are essentially floating swimming pools with wastes being collected and treated prior to disposal into the ocean. A first step at least, but I've never heard it mentioned in Atlantic Canada. Cheers, Chris in Halifax Quoting Marg Millard <mmillard@eastlink.ca>: > It seems to me that the easiest way to prevent both of the above big problems > is to remove the "farming" cages from the ocean, onto land, where the pumped, > recirculated sea water used can be monitored, and all the wastes can be > collected and treated before the "waste water" is released back into the sea. > > > My two cents, from Jim in Wolfville. > .............................. > that is what we are striving for here. Out of the water!! The damage done > (yes this is a particular bay, Port Mouton, but the science we have gathered > does back us up 100%) is desperately slow to repair and is, in fact, > stalled. So much for the farmers estimate of recovery. > Marg in White Point > > > http://MargMillard.ca
next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects