[NatureNS] Fw: Forest Persectives continued

From: David & Alison Webster <dwebster@glinx.com>
To: NatureNS@chebucto.ns.ca
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:46:38 -0300
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects


I just noticed that this went to Dave P only but was intended for the list.
DW
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David & Alison Webster" <dwebster@glinx.com>
To: "David Patriquin" <patriqui@DAL.CA>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: Forest Persectives continued


> Hi Dave P & All,                    Oct 31, 2012
>    Nick's statement that "They were [special], and they can be the more 
> so, despite the doom purveyors of climate change consequences..." tells me 
> that he belittles the potential detrimental effects of climate change. And 
> 'net benefit' follows from the idea that higher temperatures will make 
> things even better.
>
>    The idea that if we just plant some southern trees then everything will 
> be fine sounds to me like more cynical manipulation by those with a vested 
> interest in tar sands industries and the like.
>
>    In years past, Danegeld kept potential foreign invaders home. In our 
> current version, carefully crafted research grants/funding (think 
> investigation of earthworm peril in Alberta to distract attention from the 
> Athabasca peril) ensure that researchers investigate only irrelevant 
> topics.
>
> Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David Patriquin" <patriqui@DAL.CA>
> To: <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>; "David & Alison Webster" 
> <dwebster@glinx.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 5:28 PM
> Subject: Forest Persectives continued
>
>
>> In response to David Websters question: "Just to clarify one point, do 
>> you then agree with Nick that climate change will be of net benefit to 
>> our forest ecosystem (or at least not detrimental)?"
>>
>> I don't read into Nick comments an argument that climatic change will  be 
>> of "net benefit"or "not detrimental".
>>
>>
>> David Patriquin
>> 6165 Murray Place
>> Halifax, N.S.
>> Canada B3H 1R9
>> e-mail: patriqui@dal.ca
>> Phone: 902-4235716
>>
>> Professor of Biology (retired)
>> Dalhousie University http://www.dal.ca
>>
>> Halifax Field Naturalists http://halifaxfieldnaturalists.ca
>> Nova Scotia Wild Flora Society http://nswildflora.ca
>> Young Naturalists Club of Nova Scotia http://ync.nature1st.net/
>> Woodens River Watershed Environmental Organization http://wrweo.ca
>> Control of Chinch Bug without Pesticides http://versicolor.ca/lawns
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5861 - Release Date: 10/29/12
>>
> 

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects