next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"/>
</head><body style="">
<div>
Mary,
</div>
<div>
   just curious about that suspiciously round  75 % figure. Is that true for all vegetation types? Here in N.S. the soil is incredibly thin. What is the source of the 75 % figure? With thanks,
</div>
<div>
Dusan Soudek
</div>
<div>
  
</div>
<div>
<br/>---------- Original Message ----------
<br/>From: Mary Macaulay <marymacaulay@hotmail.com>
<br/>To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
<br/>Date: April 11, 2013 at 7:56 AM
</div>
<div>
<br/>Subject: [NatureNS] Forest Biomass burning environmental lunacy
</div>
<div>
<br/>75% of the carbon stored on land is in the soil Dave. The richest deepest soils are under an old growth forest. A healthy forest canopy continues to feed that soil and protects it from erosion and oxidation. So .. the arguments against Industrial forestry are clear cut...
<br/>
<br/>Mary Macaulay, P.Eng.
<br/>Executive Director
<br/>Atlantic Concrete Association
<br/>www.atlanticconcrete.ca
<br/>Office: 902-443-4456
<br/>Cell: 902-489-2000
<br/>Fax: 902-404-8074
</div>
</body></html>
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects