[NatureNS] Fairy rings: a correction

From: "Laviolette, Lance (EXP)" <lance.laviolette@lmco.com>
To: "naturens@chebucto.ns.ca" <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:25:45 -0400
Thread-Topic: [NatureNS] Fairy rings: a correction
Thread-Index: Ac7Kg595hcaZqQaoRQquZwvGWWfvAA==
Accept-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
Hi David,

Would your original statement have been more correct if written as '... an unfortunate consequence of scientific journal enthusiasm'?

All the best,

Lance

-----Original Message-----
From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca [mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] On Behalf Of David & Alison Webster
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:00 AM
To: NatureNS@chebucto.ns.ca
Subject: EXTERNAL: [NatureNS] Fairy rings: a correction

Dear All,                            Oct 16, 2013
    In my e-mail of Oct 11 I said "Calling such vaguely ring-like growths fairy rings is an unfortunate consequence of internet enthusiasm."

    I see now, in a paper which Steve brought to my attention (Danin & Orshan), that the term fairy ring has been used to refer to any roughly ring-like arrangement of plants for many years; at least back to1935.

Yt. DW 

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects