[NatureNS] SILENCE OF THE LABS again TONIGHT on CBC

From: darrell@abolitphotos.ca
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 02:09:26 +0000
References: <6D06A863-FC5B-4964-AB3C-A0A4B41288B0@eastlink.ca> <3F40DD9F-A837-4B90-A1F0-024681CBE5BB@eastlink.ca> <6E9AAFD8E95140B08A9070B4E24FB81A@D58WQPH1> <20140112000912.q2xn2vr7cwc0sw80@webcentremail.webcentre.ca> <E945B9BA891E42DE9CDE62C473320143@D58WQPH1>
User-Agent: Webmail 6.0
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

that does in fact&amp;nbsp;boil down to&amp;nbsp;Ottawa telling us how 
This message is in MIME format. 

--=_4b6pwm2h1ufq
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=UTF-8;
	format="flowed"
Content-Description: Plaintext Version of Message
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I was talking of your political agenda David, nothing more. You talk of 
balance, my input was soley for that purpose. 
  =C2=A0
  Back to nature please,
  =C2=A0
  =C2=A0
  =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
  =C2=A0

On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 21:44:22 -0400, David & Alison Webster  wrote:

         This thread is a bit off topic but=C2=A0IMHO your evaluation is 
100% incorrect.=C2=A0=C2=A0How can investigation of our past or studies of 
current marine pollution be construed as=C2=A0socialist babble ? Who, other=
 
than the Harper government,=C2=A0has been telling the rest of the country 
how to live ? [I by the way strongly object to Harper's program of 
phasing out=C2=A0incandescent lighbulbs; an absolute buy my better bulb 
boondoggle and that does in fact=C2=A0boil down to=C2=A0Ottawa telling us h=
ow 
to live. In some climates it may make sense. Here it fits like an anvil 
in a shirt pocket.]
  =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0And broadcast mudslinging has never solved=
 a difficult 
problem. Selective disbanding of inconvenient=C2=A0science has the effect 
of dismissing truth as being of no consequence. 
  =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 A passage in 1 Esdras (4,12) comes to mind; "Women are=
 
strongest but truth conquers all."
  =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Science is among other things "the handmaiden of indus=
try" and 
the foundation of all science is an objective=C2=A0search for truth,=C2=A0b=
ut 
balance in all undertakings is an essential component of eventual 
success. How is balance possible if some questions can not be raised ? 
Of what value will extensive extraction of arctic petrochemicals be if 
it helps trigger a chaotic climatic maelstrom ?
  Yt, DW

  =C2=A0



--=_4b6pwm2h1ufq
Content-Type: multipart/related;
	boundary="=_4l9lk3xuyw5y";
	start="4laaq4w1sxg6@webcentremail.webcentre.ca"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This message is in MIME format. 

--=_4l9lk3xuyw5y
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=UTF-8
Content-Description: HTML Version of Message
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-ID: 4laaq4w1sxg6@webcentremail.webcentre.ca

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=
=3DUTF-8"
data-hsystem=3D"true"></head><body><style>p{margin: 0;padding: 0;}</style><=
p>I was
talking of your political agenda David, nothing more. You talk of balance, =
my
input was soley for that purpose. </p>
<p>=C2=A0</p>
<p>Back to nature please,</p>
<p>=C2=A0</p>
<p>=C2=A0</p>
<p>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D</p>
<p>=C2=A0</p>
<p><br><br>On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 21:44:22 -0400, David &amp; Alison Webster
&lt;dwebster@glinx.com&gt; wrote:<br></p>
<blockquote style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(=
0,0,0)
2px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=3D"ltr"
_mce_style=3D"border-left: 2px solid #000000; padding-right: 0px; padding-l=
eft:
5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;">
<div id=3D"html-message"><meta name=3D"GENERATOR" content=3D"MSHTML 8.00.60=
01.23543">
<div>This thread is a bit off topic but=C2=A0IMHO your evaluation is 100%
incorrect.=C2=A0=C2=A0How can investigation of our past or studies of curre=
nt marine
pollution be construed as=C2=A0socialist babble ? Who, other than the Harpe=
r
government,=C2=A0has been telling the rest of the country how to live ? [I =
by the
way strongly object to Harper's program of phasing out=C2=A0incandescent li=
ghbulbs;
an absolute buy my better bulb boondoggle and that does in fact=C2=A0boil d=
own
to=C2=A0Ottawa telling us how to live. In some climates it may make sense. =
Here it
fits like an anvil in a shirt pocket.]</div>
<div>=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0And broadcast mudslinging has never sol=
ved a difficult problem. 
Selective disbanding of inconvenient=C2=A0science has the effect of dismiss=
ing truth
as being of no consequence. </div>
<div>=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 A passage in 1 Esdras (4,12) comes to mind; "Women =
are strongest but
truth conquers all." </div>
<div>=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Science is among other things "the handmaiden of in=
dustry" and the
foundation of all science is an objective=C2=A0search for truth,=C2=A0but b=
alance in all
undertakings is an essential component of eventual success. How is balance
possible if some questions can not be raised ? Of what value will extensive
extraction of arctic petrochemicals be if it helps trigger a chaotic climat=
ic
maelstrom ? </div>
<div>Yt, DW</div></div></blockquote>
<p><br><br></p>
<p>=C2=A0</p>
<p><br></p></body></html>
--=_4l9lk3xuyw5y--

--=_4b6pwm2h1ufq--

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects