[NatureNS] Miner's Marsh offleash park...

References: <CADF8qtZBdRNMcQhpic1L3D6vk4fU9_bV1tLsjsdgzqAfy6Cz9g@mail.gmail.com> <003801cf8eec$ff20cf00$fd626d00$@eastlink.ca> <A75FE50A3B7C4B97AA88764ABF7310F6@D58WQPH1> <1785906328-1403571618-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1553173427-@b11.c8.bise6.blackberry> <CAAwXBYfupfgfd8gPWfHjWeroX=gsKTHVTfpaBXr9iWwVRy16pw@mail.gmail.com> <7EEE395A-1378-4B7A-9186-A81B025BB2BF@xplornet.com> <561506e2860c4a83a8c5b69572fbdb03@BL2PR03MB115.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ian Woodman <calicoangus@bell.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:51:52 -0400
To: "naturens@chebucto.ns.ca" <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
So Chris, I think what Steve is saying is that we all have to put up with David's BS just as much as we have to put up with yours. 

Keep it civil and if you don't want to read his emails....delete them and move on. Way too much crap in this world to dwell on the negative! (If that's not too much BS). 

Sent from Ian's iPhone
This message contains 100% recycled electrons.

> On Jun 23, 2014, at 11:15 PM, Stephen Shaw <srshaw@Dal.Ca> wrote:
> 
> Dave is one of the more broadly knowledgeable and thoughtful contributors on this network, and even his more pungent comments are usually worth reading.  If we must choose as suggested, I'd vote for more spice and less Pepper.
> Steve, Hfx
> ________________________________________
> From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca [naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] on behalf of Annabelle Thiebaux [hamst@xplornet.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 10:42 PM
> To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
> Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Miner's Marsh offleash park...
> 
> I enjoy them too Doug [Richard].
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Jun 23, 2014, at 10:36 PM, Richard Stern <sternrichard@gmail.com<mailto:sternrichard@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> People may not agree with many of David's posts, and I suspect he might post some stuff just for the sake of being controversial, or to initiate discussion, but actually I usually enjoy reading them. There are others who sometimes post in a similar vein. I don't think disagreeing with the contents of a post, or many posts,  would be grounds for removing someone, as long as that person is not rude, demeaning  or insulting to other members. Any thoughts, List-owner (or David)?
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:00 PM, <cpepper@ymail.com<mailto:cpepper@ymail.com>> wrote:
> Sooo, how much of David Webster's bullshit do we have to put up with before we can remove him from the list?
> 
> Chris
> Sent wirelessly from my BlackBerry device on the Bell network.
> Envoyé sans fil par mon terminal mobile BlackBerry sur le réseau de

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects