[NatureNS] xylem damage

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
References: <2BD977FDA20E4FCBB2BCD0E90715B67A@D58WQPH1>
From: Rick Whitman <dendroica.caerulescens@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 17:23:24 -0300
To: "naturens@chebucto.ns.ca" <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
Dave,
Are you referring to damage from H. Arthur ? I feel the damage is obvious here. There was a massive loss of leaves, so many as to change the visual impression looking at light thru the trees. Also, the cleanup is unprecedented in 35 yrs. Branches not ripped off are weakened & not returned to position. The most exposed leaves certainly look wilted. 

Rick Whitman. 

> On Jul 8, 2014, at 10:58 AM, David & Alison Webster <dwebster@glinx.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear All,                                July 8, 2014
>   I have not been into woods yet but I have noticed in the yard that many leaves of Ash, Sweet Cherry Seedling, Sugar Maple and Norway Maple are somewhat wilted, especially near branch tips, even early in the morning. This suggests structural damage to xylem elements such that gas (water vapor or air) blocks water movement.
> 
>   One great mystery in Plant Physiology is how occlusion of xylem elements by vapor doesn't happen routinely which would limit plant height to 30' and plant growth to very humid environments. The vapor pressure of water at 10o C is about 9 mm Hg, 4 mm at 0o C (standard atmosphere being 760 mm) so at tensions greater than 751 mm Hg (at 10o C) one would expect the water in xylem elements to boil. And water tensions can exceed 80 atm (drawing on memory) with often no Ill effects.
> 
>   As noted in a private Dec 2013 e-mail (below) I think the explanation may lie in the state of water in xylem elements; not truly free water but bound in a gel. Analogous to the movement of electrons in a conductor, only a small fraction of the water in a xylem element is free to move at any instant. Consequent the activity of water is very low and the vapor pressures determined on free water do not apply. This is speculation but it is the only mechanism, known to me, that makes any sense.
> 
> START OF PASTE\\\\\\\\\\\\\
>   Interesting that Driwater is 2% Cellulose, 98% water and is solid. It would not be possible to directly demonstrate the presence of a weak gel in Xylem elements but it would be possible to compare maximum tensions attained in fine glass capillaries containing various dilutions of cellulose gel or silica gel or various hydrogels. The presence of cellulose chains that are attached to the wall only at one end in xylem elements is not so far fetched. Assuming secondary thickening from the primary wall inward with cellulose units sewed into the ends of various strands by metabolic action, how would the end of a spiral chain ever manage to become attached to the wall ? When the cell contents die and become digested by autolysis  (sp ?) are there not always going to be a swirl of loose cellulose ends ?
> END OF PASTE\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
> 
> Yt, DW
> 

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects