next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects I'd say it's option #2 Sent from Ian's iPhone This message contains 100% recycled electrons. > On Oct 17, 2014, at 11:18 AM, John and Nhung <nhungjohn@eastlink.ca> wrote: > > Either we have some well-intentioned, bright, but overly naïve > decision-makers who need more exposure to reality before they assume the > responsibilities they carry, or we have a pathological aversion to > inconvenient truths. > > -----Original Message----- > From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca [mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] > On Behalf Of Burkhard Plache > Sent: October-17-14 11:26 AM > To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca > Subject: [NatureNS] Revenue Canada and Non-Partisan Activities > > Please read the following piece by CBC about an Ontario Field Naturalist > Club. > Revenue Canada considers their activities partisan ant threatens to > reconsider their tax exempt status. > > http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/revenue-canada-targets-birdwatchers-for-poli > tical-activity-1.2799546 > > Not cheered, > Burkhard > >
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects