[NatureNS] amusing Globe & Mail article about the National Bird

Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:41:10 -0400
From: bdigout <bdigout@seaside.ns.ca>
To: <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
References: <CAL4T0NyN+4S-RJNRi-q_PidPGbsisMRPRxnV1rEXR-vCMP3AOQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.7.2
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
On 28 Jan 2015 01:29, Fred Schueler wrote:
> On 1/27/2015 5:08 PM, bdigout wrote:
>> He has some good points!
>
> * but he has no idea about the Canada Jay, Perisorius canadensis, the
> natural choice if the Raven is prempted by being the Provincial Bird
> of the Yukon. I'd like to see Mr Patterson nest in February, living
> off scavenged bits he'd glued to Spruce twigs during the course of 
> the
> summer with his spit.
>
> fred.
> ================================
>>
>> On 27 Jan 2015 13:27, N Robinson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 
>>> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/a-national-bird-how-about-that-one-with-canada-in-its-name/article22635071/?utm_source=Shared+Article+Sent+to+User&utm_medium=E-mail:+Newsletters+/+E-Blasts+/+etc.&utm_campaign=Shared+Web+Article+Links
>>>
Not to be argumentative, I agree that the Canada Jay is more worthy, 
but was simply commenting that Patterson had made some interesting 
conclusions.

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects