[NatureNS] Clematis sp leather flowers

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
References: <CAFVjxapj3u2Np+Kd1=KdTU5kw7ttAnUK_0-LpPmaaczgXD-62w@mail.gmail.com> <824D4D58-0B09-4BF3-8375-F93E1114AFF0@dal.ca>
From: bev wigney <bkwigney@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:23:43 -0700
To: "naturens@chebucto.ns.ca" <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
This webpage states that Clematis virginiana is also known as Leather Flower.  
http://ontariotrees.com/main/species.php?id=2086 
There is Virgin's Bower clematis growing near my place at Round Hill near Annapolis Royal.  I would think it common.  Around my area, it grows along forest edges on land that was probably last farmed about 30 or more years ago. Maybe I could watch for these insects this summer.

bev

Sent from my iPad

On 2015-03-23, at 9:02 PM, Stephen Shaw <srshaw@Dal.Ca> wrote:

> My UK jumping bug colleague is hoping to return here for a couple of weeks in the summer (if that ever happens), and is after collecting a particular mirid bug called Halticus apterus (female appears to be flightless, with sturdy jumping legs).  
> 
> Some old collecting records from Ottawa list it as being collected here sometimes on 'leather flowers’, a Clematis species — but there are about 300 of them.  Does anyone know what the species might be, from the common name (may even apply to more than one species?)?  Clematis flowers on line don’t look at all leathery — anyone know the origin of the odd sounding name?   If the name does track to a particular species, is there a good type of habitat to look in for it?  Is it common?
> 
> Some of the specimens collected in the 60s and 70s by Leonard A. Kelton (Biosystematics, Ottawa) came from Kentville at latitude 45°04’, longitude -64°30’ which doesn’t look a particularly good current prospect on Google Earth.  Another location was south of Mt Uniacke estate which might have been more open back then, but now looks heavily wooded, which doesn’t sound good either.   So we are a bit short of places to prospect for Halticus.
> 
> Any info would be useful and appreciated.
> Steve (Hfx)

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects