next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
<DIV><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 12
Quoting Dave&Jane Schlosberg <dschlosb-g@ns.sympatico.ca>:
> This talk of house sparrows in rural areas sounds well and good.
> But I will repeat my downtown Dartmouth story:
> house sparrows were abundant here year round 20 years ago and
> practically non-existent today in any season.
> And I can?t detect that the environment has changed very much.
* this decline in House Sparrows should be teaching us valuable
lessons about how species fit into ecological communities, but to
learn this lesson we'd need either an amateur dedicated to it who has
a well-paying undemanding job, or adequate funding for the study of
not-at-risk species.
fred.
------------------------------------------------------------
Frederick W. Schueler & Aleta Karstad
Mudpuppy Night - http://pinicola.ca/mudpup1.htm
Vulnerable Watersheds - http://vulnerablewaters.blogspot.ca/
study our books - http://pinicola.ca/books/index.htm
RR#2 Bishops Mills, Ontario, Canada K0G 1T0
on the Smiths Falls Limestone Plain 44* 52'N 75* 42'W
(613)258-3107 <bckcdb at istar.ca> http://pinicola.ca/
"[The] two fundamental steps of scientific thought - the conjecture
and refutation of Popper - have little place in the usual conception
of intelligence. If something is to be dismissed as inadequate, it is
surely not Darwin [, whose] works manifest the activity of a mind
seeking for wisdom, a value which conventional philosophy has largely
abandoned." Ghiselen, 1969. Triumph of the Darwinian Method, p 237.
------------------------------------------------------------
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects