next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0889_01D14C92.C2CAECB0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear All, Jan 11, 2016
Those who imagine that nature knows best will do well to not =
advance that argument as a reason to back off from abusive harvesting of =
biomass. That sort of attitude infuriates practical people and would =
unfortunately generate resistance to change from current deplorable =
practices.=20
I had hoped to sometime expand on my e-mail of Mar 1(dated Feb 28), =
2015, because I have many ideas with regard to possible practical ways =
to back away from over-mechanized large-scale forestry and some of these =
might work but it would be pointless to discuss these when "look but =
don't touch" trumps all other considerations.=20
=20
If no way is found to effect a transition, so that more people can =
earn a modest living from woodland, then most private woodland over time =
will be bought up by big business and this is perhaps already under way.
Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville
=20
=20
=20
------=_NextPart_000_0889_01D14C92.C2CAECB0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 8.00.6001.23588">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>Dear All, =20
=
=20
Jan 11, =
2016</DIV>
<DIV> Those who imagine that nature knows best =
will do=20
well to not advance that argument as a reason to back off from =
abusive=20
harvesting of biomass. That sort of attitude infuriates practical people =
and=20
would unfortunately generate resistance to change from current =
deplorable=20
practices. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> I had hoped to sometime expand on my e-mail of =
Mar=20
1(dated Feb 28), 2015, because I have many ideas with regard=20
to possible practical ways to back away from =
over-mechanized=20
large-scale forestry and some of these might work but it would be =
pointless=20
to discuss these when "look but don't touch" trumps all other=20
considerations. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> If no way is found to effect a transition, so =
that more=20
people can earn a modest living from woodland, then most private =
woodland over=20
time will be bought up by big business and this is perhaps already under =
way.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0889_01D14C92.C2CAECB0--
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects