[NatureNS] Killing Endangered Species on Private Land is Ok

From: "John and Nhung" <nhungjohn@eastlink.ca>
To: <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
References: <004c01d3f780$9bfba070$d3f2e150$@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 10:06:56 -0300
Thread-index: AQK+BFLQ8Js4tiM4HprQCS/nEu2fxwFrPJLRAUoe8EeiXnodEA==
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
This is a multipart message in MIME format.

--Boundary_(ID_UdeJ4BhCKVMK2YhGtRQOcg)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

John I think your idea of a closed season for cutting makes a lot of =
sense, and may be worth pursuing.  For sure, there would need to be =
discussion and compromise, but it could be an initiative that reduces =
damage to forest species during breeding season.

=20

Where is Bill Lahey=E2=80=99s e-mail?  J

=20

From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca =
[mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] On Behalf Of John Kearney
Sent: May 30, 2018 8:22 AM
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Subject: RE: [NatureNS] Killing Endangered Species on Private Land is Ok

=20

Dear David,

I=E2=80=99m not against the small independent logger. But I do want them =
to refrain from logging in May through mid-July whether it is =
clearcutting or selective harvesting. And if they insist on cutting at =
that time, they should do a science-based survey for the endangered and =
sensitive species in the woodlot and avoid the areas they inhabit. =
Stewardship should never be sacrificed for profit margins. As radical as =
this sounds, the creatures of the forest should be regarded with the =
same dignity as you rightfully bestow on the small independent logger.=20

John

=20

=20

From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca <naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca> On =
Behalf Of David
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 19:09
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Killing Endangered Species on Private Land is Ok

=20

Hi John & All,

    As I am sure all would agree, the crucial step in understanding and =
managing any complex system is identification of the coarse controls. If =
these, the large effects, are overlooked or out of adjustment then =
fiddling with the fine controls is just wishful thinking.

    The Common Nighthawk nests on bare ground and eats flying insects. =
It has been decades since I have heard a Nighthawk over Kentville. If =
anything, clearcut logging with lots of decaying brush to spawn insects =
should favor Nighthawks; nesting sites plus food.=20

     Do you honestly suppose that logging has caused this collapse of =
flying insects and Nighthawks ? Way above that tiny effect I would wager =
oversanitazion; doggy doo to the landfill (insane !; doggy doo is a =
resource for invertebrates and plants), yard trash bundled for indoor =
composting (insane; yard trash is the staff of life for many =
invertebrates), Bug zappers and the like (towns are death zones for =
flying insects; gee I wonder why bats got white mouth ?).=20

    Pogo, about 1956 hit the nail on the head while looking at a swamp =
half filled with assorted trash, "I have seen the enemy and he is us." =
And unfortunately far too few people noticed; or noticed and forgot.

    Did your Nighthawk fly up from a nest or just fly into view from =
elsewhere ? Does it matter ? Birds are killed on public highways in =
great numbers. Should someone walk ahead of each vehicle with a lantern =
so this does not happen ?=20

    Another endangered species is the independent tree harvester. The =
profit margins are paper thin or negative and down time can land you in =
debt. Thus we have advanced to forestry by mowing machines 24/365.=20

    In my view the small independent logger, especially if selective =
cutting is practiced, should be subsidized (as in much of Europe) and =
not treated like some untouchable.

    End of rant.

Yt, DW, Kentville

=20

=20

------ Original Message ------

From: "John Kearney" <john.kearney@ns.sympatico.ca>

To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca

Sent: 5/29/2018 4:09:46 PM

Subject: [NatureNS] Killing Endangered Species on Private Land is Ok

=20

Dear NatureNS readers,=20

I wish to express my sorrow about the state of environmental policy in =
the Province of Nova Scotia. I thought I couldn=E2=80=99t get more =
disheartened when the Premier indicated that oil and gas development =
should be permitted in Marine Protected Areas. While such a statement =
would be par for the course (no pun intended) for US President, Donald =
Trump. I didn=E2=80=99t expect it here.

=20

Yesterday, however, this sorrow hit closer to home. In my home village =
of Carleton, in Yarmouth County, I witnessed what I believe to be the =
destruction of a Common Nighthawk nest by a forestry operation. I =
believe this because I was listening to a tree harvesting machine, =
blocked from my view from a stand of softwood, but very loud as I was =
only a couple hundred of meters away. All of a sudden, at about 2 PM, a =
Common Nighthawk flew up from where the machine was harvesting and =
subsequently circled the machine a couple of times before disappearing.

=20

I immediately called the local office of the Department of Natural =
Resources. The regional biologist was not in but about an hour later a =
wildlife technician called to tell me not to worry. The biologist had =
indicated that Common Nighthawks don=E2=80=99t nest in the forest and =
have a wide foraging area so it was just passing by. I disputed this =
claim, noted that forestry should not be permitted during the bird =
breeding season, and asked that at minimum, the Department inform the =
landowner that an endangered species, listed under the Species at Risk =
Act, was likely nesting in the area of forestry operations.  I was then =
informed there was nothing the government would do because the forestry =
operation was on private land.

=20

So despite the fact that it is against the law (Migratory Birds =
Convention Act) to destroy the nest, eggs, or young of a migratory bird, =
and despite the fact the Common Nighthawk is protected by federal and =
Nova Scotia species at risk legislation, it is ok to destroy the nest, =
eggs, or young of an endangered migratory bird if it is on private =
property. I wonder if they are planning on allowing the hunting of fawns =
and moose calves on private property year-round too?

=20

Thanks for listening to my lament.

John

=20

=20

=20

=20

=20


--Boundary_(ID_UdeJ4BhCKVMK2YhGtRQOcg)
Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" =
xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8"><meta =
name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 14 (filtered =
medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
	{font-family:Wingdings;
	panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Wingdings;
	panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Tahoma;
	panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:"Comic Sans MS";
	panose-1:3 15 7 2 3 3 2 2 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions