[NatureNS] flowers respond to sound of pollinators - study

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
From: N Robinson <nrobbyn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 22:24:03 -0400
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects


--000000000000e944da058d497e0a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This is an interesting study - I have not read the whole report but some of
you might tackle it:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.13331

Abstract

Can plants sense natural airborne sounds and respond to them rapidly? We
show that *Oenothera drummondii* flowers, exposed to playback sound of a
flying bee or to synthetic sound signals at similar frequencies, produce
sweeter nectar within 3 min, potentially increasing the chances of cross
pollination. We found that the flowers vibrated mechanically in response to
these sounds, suggesting a plausible mechanism where the flower serves as
an auditory sensory organ. Both the vibration and the nectar response were
frequency=E2=80=90specific: the flowers responded and vibrated to pollinato=
r
sounds, but not to higher frequency sound. Our results document for the
first time that plants can rapidly respond to pollinator sounds in an
ecologically relevant way. Potential implications include plant resource
allocation, the evolution of flower shape and the evolution of pollinators
sound. Finally, our results suggest that plants may be affected by other
sounds as well, including anthropogenic ones.

--000000000000e944da058d497e0a
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">This is an interesting s=
tudy - I have not read the whole report but some of you might tackle it:<br=
><br><a href=3D"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.13331">http=
s://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.13331</a><br clear=3D"all"><div=
><br><div class=3D"gmail-abstract-group">
      <span style=3D"font-weight:normal"><font size=3D"2">Abstract</font></=
span>
         <div class=3D"gmail-article-section__content en gmail-main">
           =20
            <p>Can plants sense natural airborne sounds and respond to them=
 rapidly? We show that <i>Oenothera drummondii</i>
 flowers, exposed to playback sound of a flying bee or to synthetic=20
sound signals at similar frequencies, produce sweeter nectar within=20
3=C2=A0min, potentially increasing the chances of cross pollination. We fou=
nd
 that the flowers vibrated mechanically in response to these sounds,=20
suggesting a plausible mechanism where the flower serves as an auditory=20
sensory organ. Both the vibration and the nectar response were=20
frequency=E2=80=90specific: the flowers responded and vibrated to pollinato=
r=20
sounds, but not to higher frequency sound. Our results document for the=20
first time that plants can rapidly respond to pollinator sounds in an=20
ecologically relevant way. Potential implications include plant resource
 allocation, the evolution of flower shape and the evolution of=20
pollinators sound. Finally, our results suggest that plants may be=20
affected by other sounds as well, including anthropogenic ones.</p>
           =20
         </div>
     =20
   </div><br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><d=
iv><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><=
br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>=
</div></div>

--000000000000e944da058d497e0a--

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects