next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects Dear All, Based on something I saw on Facebook Nov. 21 I gather that logging rights, for a given block of crown woodland, are awarded for the immediate cut only as opposed to perpetual rights which can be kept or sold. Can anyone confirm that this is correct ? If this is indeed the case then the current orgy, of logging as if there were no future, is understandable. Because for the company in question there is no future on that block of woodland. In much wild woodland an investment of cash for e.g. culling trash trees or non commercial thinning and time must be made before selective cutting can become profitable. Unless a company has perpetual access to a tract of woodland such investment of money and time would be foolish. Yt, DW, Kentville
next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects