Fwd: sfp-32: Canada and the New Crusaders

Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 17:16:34 -0700
From: Michael Posluns <mposluns@accglobal.net>
Organization: The StillWaters Group
To: "sfp-net@chebucto.ns.ca" <sfp-net@chebucto.ns.ca>, "\"R. Reuel Karpov, Ph.D.\"" <karpov@erols.com>,
References: <fc.000f4cb5000000003b9aca009f0d6984.767fc3@EDU.YorkU.CA>
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <sfp-net-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects


It might help if this analogy were extended much farther.  In
terms of crusaders it is, perhaps, not insignificant that the
government doing the ethnic cleansing -- always a major goal of
crusaders -- calls itself Orthodx Christian while those whom they
seek to cleanse from the land are, nominally at least, Muslims.

It is, indeed, ironic that for reasons which remain unclear a
Western European and North American alliance has chosen to defend
the Muslims and to attack the Orthodox.

Is does not help to say that Canada is fawning.  Canada has
fawned most of its existence, either for the U.K. or for the
U.S.  Did we not do much the same thing for just as foggy reasons
in 1914.  What would help much more is to understand why all the
parties in the House of Commons, including the NDP who used to
annually offer motions to reduce Canada's contribution to $1 have
spoken in favour of this air farce.

Perhaps the religious analogy, prompted by the Crusade reference
needs to be much further explored.  What are the motives of a
party led by Alexa McDonough, a woman who claims to be the
intellectual if not the spiritual descendant of Tommy Douglas for
rallying around the Liberals.  

And why have several Tory Senators, not only Doug Roche spoken
out against this "touch your toes" posture?  

Would it be nice if "Science for Peace" could offer the kind of
intellectual analysis that attempted to address these questions. 
I, for one, do not know the answers.  It has taken me all this
time to creep up to the questions.

If anyone out there is willing to seriously speak to these
questions I would be deeply indebted for the opportunity of such
a dialouge.


mp

P.S.  One place to start is to think deeply about the etymology
of "Crusader".  It has, I think, to do with carrying the cross,
advancing Christianity, and thrusting out the infidels.  Does
this not describe the conduct of both Milosovic and the NATO
alliance.
 -- 
Michael W. Posluns,
The StillWaters Group,
First Nations Relations & Public Policy.

Please note new address:  mposluns@accglobal.net

Phone 416 656-8613
Fax   416 656-2715

36 Lauder Avenue,
Toronto, Ontario,
M6H 3E3.

We offer Canadian parliamentary debates by topics and bills.

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects