next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
yl
--_3b813e04-3bef-4b60-bf10-ea9db0454f89_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All=2C
I've used Canon 12/36 IS bins for a number of years and as Richard said =
there are good and bad features.=20
On the good side the IS feature works very well and is particularly good=
for hawk watching=2C observing birds from boats or in windy conditions. Th=
ey would be my first choice for a whale watcher although they are only wate=
r resistant not waterproof. The biggest negative is the weight=3B they're h=
eavy and on a long hike can put a groove in your neck.=20
The optics are great although the FOV is not as good as some other mode=
ls in the same price range.=20
As to cost I would say they fall in the mid to high price range.=20
They work OK for me (they are set up for my particular eye problems) bu=
t would caution that you should take them on a test drive before buying. Al=
l the best.
Fritz McEvoy=20
Sunrise Valley=2C CB (near Dingwall)
From: sternrichard@gmail.com
Date: Fri=2C 3 Jul 2009 17:28:05 -0300
Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Spotting Scope
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
There are indeed a few that have built in Image Stabilization=2C just like =
some cameras. Unfortunately they tend to have a lot of disadvantages=2C suc=
h as having relatively poor optical quality=2C or being very heavy=2C or ex=
pensive=2C or a narrow field of view. But if you have shaky hands and are w=
illing to put up with all that=2C they can indeed be excellent. I think tha=
t a light weight high optical quality 7X or 8X power standard binocular wou=
ld usually be a better bet for carrying around in the field. Image stabiliz=
ed ones seem to be more popular with astronomers and boaters than with bird=
ers.
Richard
On Fri=2C Jul 3=2C 2009 at 3:55 PM=2C Nancy Roberts <nancy.roberts@ns.sympa=
tico.ca> wrote:
There are binoculars that compensate - somehow - for unsteadiness. My fathe=
r loved his.
Nancy
Nancy Roberts Design
Celebrating 17 years of making you look GOOD
Dartmouth=2C NS B2Y 2X6
902 461-9488
On 3-Jul-09=2C at 2:40 PM=2C David&Jane Schlosberg wrote:
I have a Vortex "Vanquish" 8X26 binocular. It was reasonably priced=3B and=
it's light=2C but it's not 100% waterproof. I haven't had any problems wi=
th it. My husband has Nikon 101793BP "Travelite EX" 8X25. It is totally =
waterproof=2C lightweight=2C and a fair bit more expensive. Both came from=
the Mahone Bay store. The optics are clear and sharp on both. The adjust=
ments are a bit smoother on the Nikon. Please publish information on spott=
ing scopes=2C if you receive any privately.
Thanks.
Jane
p.s. If you have unsteady hands=2C as I do=2C a stronger powered binocular=
becomes more difficult to hold steady.
-----Original Message-----
From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca [mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca]O=
n Behalf Of Gayle MacLean
Sent: Friday=2C July 03=2C 2009 7:45 AM
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Spotting Scope
And speaking of Spotting Scopes (what is the advantage of using them?) & bi=
noculars in general=2C (& I apologize if this topic has been addressed befo=
re)=2C where is a good place here in HRM=2C to find ones that:
1. birders love
2. are reasonably priced=20
3. and that don't weigh a ton.
=20
I got very nice binoculars for Christmas but they just get so darned heavy =
after a short time when I'm out peering up into the trees.=20
So=2C for the lady birders out there=2C what are your favourites and where =
did you get them?
=20
Many thanks!!
=20
Gayle MacLean
Dartmouth
--- On Thu=2C 7/2/09=2C Margaret E.Millard <mmillard@eastlink.ca> wrote:
From: Margaret E.Millard <mmillard@eastlink.ca>
Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Spotting Scope
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Received: Thursday=2C July 2=2C 2009=2C 10:59 PM
Hello Lois. I could be interested in this. Where are you located?
Marg Millard=2C White Point=2C Queens
http://margmillard.ca
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Lois Codling" <loiscodling@hfx.eastlink.ca>
To: "Nature NS" <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
Sent: Thursday=2C July 02=2C 2009 10:30 PM
Subject: [NatureNS] Spotting Scope
> Anyone interested in purchasing the following before it is advertised
> more generally:
>
> Starter spotting telescope - $100
>
> Used original pattern Bushnell Spacemaster II
>
> Optics in excellent condition=2C though the body is somewhat battered -
> Objective lens cap will not go on.
>
> Including an extremely good 22x wide angle eyepiece=2C and a 40x eyepiece
> which can be useful in good viewing conditions.
>
> please contact me at the above e-mail address.
>
> Lois Codling
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.374 / Virus Database: 270.13.2/2215 - Release Date: 07/02/09=20
18:06:00
The new Internet Explorer=AE 8 - Faster=2C safer=2C easier. Optimized for Y=
ahoo! Get it Now for Free!
--=20
#################
Dr.R.B.Stern=2C =20
P.O. Box 300=2C
Port Williams=2C
N.S.=2C Canada=2C
B0P 1T0
Richard Stern=2C=20
317 Middle Dyke Rd.
Port Williams=2C NS=2C Canada
B0P 1T0
sternrichard@gmail.com
###################
_________________________________________________________________
Create a cool=2C new character for your Windows Live=99 Messenger.=20
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=3D9656621=
--_3b813e04-3bef-4b60-bf10-ea9db0454f89_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt=3B
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'>
Hi =3BAll=2C<BR>
 =3B =3B I've used Canon 12/36 IS bins for a number of years and as=
Richard said there are =3Bgood and bad features. =3B<BR>
 =3B =3B On the good side the IS feature works very well and is par=
ticularly good for hawk watching=2C =3Bobserving birds from boats or in=
windy conditions. They would be my first choice for a whale watcher althou=
gh they are only water resistant not waterproof. The biggest =3Bnegativ=
e is the weight=3B they're =3Bheavy and on a long hike can put a groove=
in your neck. <BR>
 =3B =3B =3B The optics are great although the FOV is not as&nb=
sp=3Bgood as some other models in the same price range. <BR>
 =3B =3B =3B As to cost I would say they fall in the mid to hig=
h price range. <BR>
 =3B =3B =3B They work OK =3Bfor me (they are set up for my=
particular eye problems) but would caution that you should take them =
=3Bon a test drive before buying. =3BAll the best.<BR>
 =3B =3B