next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060204070909050808010900
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I wouldn't get very excited about the this, a lot of other evidence
indicates a definite global warming. The following is from a comment on
'livescience.com"
".... The study, published July 26 in the open-access online journal
Remote Sensing, got public attention when a writer for The Heartland
Institute, a libertarian think-tank that promotes climate change
skepticism
<http://www.livescience.com/11372-top-10-craziest-environmental-ideas.html>,
wrote for Forbes magazine that the study disproved the global warming
worries of climate change "alarmists."
<http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html>
However, mainstream climate scientists say that the argument advanced in
the paper is neither new nor correct. The paper's author, University of
Alabama, Huntsville researcher Roy Spencer, is a climatechange
<http://www.livescience.com/15293-climate-change-cloud-cover.html#>
skeptic and controversial figure within the climate research community.
"He's taken an incorrect model, he's tweaked it to match observations,
but the conclusions you get from that are not correct," Andrew Dessler,
a professor of atmospheric sciences at Texas A&M University, said of
Spencer's new study...."
One has to be very careful to not take everything as given by public
releases but look at the arguments in detail.
Larry Bogan
On 30/07/2011 8:35 PM, Lois Codling wrote:
>
> Are the scientists who are always ready to drop a theory in face of
> evidence, ready?
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html
>
>
> Lois Codling
>
--------------060204070909050808010900
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary="------------000701000109040603040007"
--------------000701000109040603040007
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
I wouldn't get very excited about the this, a lot of other evidence
indicates a definite global warming. The following is from a
comment on 'livescience.com"<br>
<br>
<p> ".... The study, published July 26 in the open-access online
journal Remote Sensing, got public attention when a writer for The
Heartland Institute, a libertarian think-tank that promotes <a
href="http://www.livescience.com/11372-top-10-craziest-environmental-ideas.html">climate
change skepticism</a>, wrote for Forbes magazine that the study
disproved the global warming worries of <a
href="http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html">climate
change "alarmists."</a> However, mainstream climate scientists
say that the argument advanced in the paper is neither new nor
correct. The paper's author, University of Alabama, Huntsville
researcher Roy Spencer, is a <a style="text-decoration: none;
border-bottom: 1px dotted rgb(149, 24, 28); border-top: medium
none; color: rgb(149, 24, 28); background-color: transparent;"
class="itxtrst itxtrsta itxthook"
href="http://www.livescience.com/15293-climate-change-cloud-cover.html#"
id="itxthook1" rel="nofollow"><span id="itxthook1w0"
class="itxtrst itxtrstspan itxthookspan" style="background:
none repeat scroll 0% 0% transparent; font-size: inherit;
font-weight: inherit; color: rgb(149, 24, 28);">climate</span><span
id="itxthook1w1" class="itxtrst itxtrstspan itxthookspan"
style="background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% transparent;
font-size: inherit; font-weight: inherit; color: rgb(149, 24,
28);"> </span><nobr style="color: rgb(149, 24, 28);"
id="itxthook1w2nobr" class="itxtrst itxtrstnobr itxthooknobr"><span
id="itxthook1w2" class="itxtrst itxtrstspan itxthookspan"
style="background:transparent; font-size:inherit;
font-color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;">change</span><img
class="itxtrst itxtrstimg itxthookicon" id="itxthook1icon"
src="cid:part1.05070501.03010707@bogan.ca"
style="${hk.icon.style}"></nobr></a> skeptic and
controversial figure within the climate research community.
</p>
<p> </p>
<p> "He's taken an incorrect model, he's tweaked it to match
observations, but the conclusions you get from that are not
correct," Andrew Dessler, a professor of atmospheric sciences at
Texas A&M University, said of Spencer's new study...."<br>
</p>
<p>One has to be very careful to not take everything as given by
public releases but look at the arguments in detail.<br>
</p>
<p>Larry Bogan<br>
<br>
</p>
<br>
<br>
On 30/07/2011 8:35 PM, Lois Codling wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4E34955F.1010102@hfx.eastlink.ca" type="cite">
<br>
Are the scientists who are always ready to drop a theory in face
of evidence, ready?
<br>
<br>
http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html
<br>
<br>
Lois Codling
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------000701000109040603040007
Content-Type: image/gif;
name="mag-glass_10x10.gif"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID: <part1.05070501.03010707@bogan.ca>
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="mag-glass_10x10.gif"
R0lGODlhCgAKAKIHAECLQOfw57/Yv4CygABkAKDFoP///////yH5BAEAAAcALAAAAAAKAAoA
AAMmeAI0clCREAp4EARjShnR1HlENHhoCS1pESkDQRTN+8qgDeH6TiQAOw==
--------------000701000109040603040007--
--------------060204070909050808010900--
next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects