next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
MsgContent">Hi All=0A <div>In the grove wa
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_08B1_01CE15AB.8055F170
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Paul & All, Feb 28, 2013
Thanks Paul. That would be Martins River and just about on the county =
line.
I agree that it does not look like a good location for a lighthouse =
so a lime kiln sounds likely but it is hard to see why it would be so =
far from navigable water. =20
I don't know the historical details of lime kiln use but logically, =
limestone would be the material of choice for transport from quarry to =
near a point of use; quicklime is very caustic, slaked lime is caustic =
and both will be lessened in effectiveness by exposure to air.
One would have to heat the limestone rocks red hot for hours and would =
want to avoid ashes in the final product so, again logically, there =
would be an iron grid onto which the stones were piled and fire =
maintained below as necessary. This would account for the 'walk way'; a =
way to maintain the fire. The stones are cooked when the largest stones =
crush readily. This would be a difficult test when the stones were red =
hot so experience would be the guide.
The initial product, quicklime, was used for preparation of plaster =
(along with hair from short-tailed horses) and other materials such as =
sharp sand and Plaster of Paris when available. Also for lime mortar I =
think; used not only with rocks & bricks but with wood to build walls.=20
[I recall, as a preschool kid,. being very impressed that lumps of =
something, carefully added to a barrel containing water, could bring the =
water to a boil !]
Quicklime lumps, gradually exposed to water but not Carbon Dioxide, =
will form hydrated or slaked lime which is also what you get when =
quicklime is added to water. =20
YT, Dave Webster, Kentville
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Paul MacDonald=20
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca=20
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Todays Walk
Hi Dave
Coordinates are 44 29 228 by 64 20 086 with the elev 21 m.
I wouldn't rule out a lighthouse as it is at the top of an inlet =
- most things on the
railway are in this part of the world but it would not have been =
a very useful lighthouse.
We use to call lighthouses so positioned as range lights and =
were useful for fishing.
As in go to a line between A and B and open out the range light! =
Make a set there!
Not as accurate as GPS but a lot of fish were so caught.
In discussion with a friend he opinioned that it might be a lime =
kilm.
I'm not sure if they used lime stone or bones for feed or =
perhaps either to produce mortar lime for use in making stone cellars, =
chimneys and so on. They were placed near the water because the feed =
often came by boat. Slacked lime seems to ring a bell. There is another =
one around on a point in the bay. You might know more about this than I. =
or perhaps someone can fill us in on the process.=20
An interesting spot nevertheless !
Paul
--- On Wed, 2/27/13, David & Alison Webster <dwebster@glinx.com> =
wrote:
From: David & Alison Webster <dwebster@glinx.com>
Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Todays Walk
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Received: Wednesday, February 27, 2013, 4:33 PM
Hi Paul, Feb 27, 2013
Can you give exact or approximate Google coordinates for =
this rock structure ? Is it close enough to the coast to have been the =
foundation of a lighthouse ?
Yt, DW
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Paul MacDonald=20
To: Nature NS=20
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 5:56 PM
Subject: [NatureNS] Todays Walk
Hi All=20
In the grove was an old stone foundation or well =
casing. It was about
2 m in diameter and had a walk way into it. The =
stone rose up about 1 m above the local=20
ground, As there was snow on the ground the area =
wasn't visible. The rock work was
well done - no mortar - just the stones properly =
placed. Someone knew what they were doing. Not impossible it was =
Acadian.
Paul
=20
=20
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2639/6101 - Release =
Date: 02/13/13
Internal Virus Database is out of date.
=20
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2639/6101 - Release Date: =
02/13/13
Internal Virus Database is out of date.
------=_NextPart_000_08B1_01CE15AB.8055F170
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 8.00.6001.19400"></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Hi Paul & All, =
=20
=
=20
Feb 28, 2013</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>Thanks Paul. That would be Martins River and just about on the =
county=20
line.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2> I agree that it does not =
look like a=20
good location for a lighthouse so a lime kiln sounds likely but it =
is hard=20
to see why it would be so far from navigable water. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2> I don't know the historical =
details of lime=20
kiln use but logically, limestone would be the material of choice =
for=20
transport from quarry to near a point of use; quicklime is very caustic, =
slaked=20
lime is caustic and both will be lessened in effectiveness by =
exposure=20
to air.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2> One would have to heat the limestone rocks red =
hot for=20
hours and would want to avoid ashes in the final product so, again =
logically,=20
there would be an iron grid onto which the stones were piled and fire =
maintained=20
below as necessary. This would account for the 'walk way'; a way