[NatureNS] re ch. swifts vs. swallows et al. -- was Barn

From: "Laviolette, Lance (EXP)" <lance.laviolette@lmco.com>
To: "naturens@chebucto.ns.ca" <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:51:52 -0400
Thread-Topic: [NatureNS] re ch. swifts vs. swallows et al. -- was Barn
Thread-Index: Ac6Bg7pBpOC+zlxOQuql5sSBeky2Dg==
Accept-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

&gt;&gt;&gt; which are still
Hi David,

The fur was most likely used as a lining of the nest cup. From what I've read, grass stems were used to strengthen the mud construction.

All the best,

Lance

-----Original Message-----
From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca [mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] On Behalf Of David & Alison Webster
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 11:52 AM
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [NatureNS] re ch. swifts vs. swallows et al. -- was Barn Swallows and Chimney Swifts

Hi All,                                July 15, 2013
    Suitable hair is one component that is likely less available now. In the 40's & 50's we always had nests in the barn and open porch and swallows would dive-bomb a dog or cat for a beak full of fur, presumably to render the mud nests stronger. Pets spent most of their daylight time free in the yard or nearby fields so there was a regular supply of hair.

Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects