[NatureNS] question re plurals of bird names?? (from nitpicker

Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 20:16:18 -0500
From: Fred Schueler <bckcdb@istar.ca>
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <5ABC0ECF-EE35-4B1A-872F-739D1AB529F1@eastlink.ca>
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.7)
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
Quoting David & Alison Webster <dwebster@glinx.com>:

>    When making preparations for some multi-step procedure I might  
> say "We will get all of our ducks in a row today and then start the  
> job tomorrow". If it is raining one might observe that it is "Good  
> weather for ducks".  But if a quantitative estimate or qualitative  
> measure were involved I might use the singular; 12 duck, few  
> Mallard. And Snipe always singular; perhaps.

* the convention I was taught in ichthyology was that "fish" was the  
plural of individual fish of one or unspecified species, but "fishes"  
was the plural of species of fish. Thus: "He collected a whole lot of  
fish in preparation for writing 'Fishes of Indiana.'"

fred.
------------------------------------------------------------
           Frederick W. Schueler & Aleta Karstad
Daily Paintings - http://karstaddailypaintings.blogspot.com/
Vulnerable Watersheds - http://vulnerablewaters.blogspot.ca/
     study our books - http://pinicola.ca/books/index.htm
           RR#2 Bishops Mills, Ontario, Canada K0G 1T0
    on the Smiths Falls Limestone Plain 44* 52'N 75* 42'W
     (613)258-3107 <bckcdb at istar.ca> http://pinicola.ca/
"[The] two fundamental steps of scientific thought - the conjecture  
and refutation of Popper - have little place in the usual conception  
of intelligence. If something is to be dismissed as inadequate, it is  
surely not Darwin [, whose] works manifest the activity of a mind  
seeking for wisdom, a value which conventional philosophy has largely  
abandoned." Ghiselen, 1969. Triumph of the Darwinian Method, p 237.
------------------------------------------------------------


next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects