[NatureNS] question re plurals of bird names?? (from nitpicker

Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 20:18:38 -0400
From: "George E. Forsyth" <g4syth@nspes.ca>
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <5ABC0ECF-EE35-4B1A-872F-739D1AB529F1@eastlink.ca>
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.2.2)
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
Andy,

To which Owl do you refer?

Bernard's would be the Forsythe Owl, mine would be the Forsyth Owl,  
but since I don't have any owl boxes it really doesn't matter. But my  
tree swallow boxes host a good number of swallows each summer!

In jest, just George


Quoting andy dean <aadean@ns.sympatico.ca>:

> With all due respect Jim...and I mean that...I always appreciate  
> your constuctive criticism...(or should that be criticisms?)  
> ....but...  ."Get a life! "
> Whether it is grammatically correct or not doesn't really matter. If  
> I tell you I saw six  woodcock or six woodcocks you have the  
> information .....and I am sure the birds don't give a hoot!   
> ....unless they are Owls.....( Am I correct in capitalizing " Owls?  
> )..., and is it Barred Owls, or Barred owls .....and whichever it  
> is, somebody is out there trying to change it I guess ....maybe to  
> Forsyth Owl, or whatever.
>  Andy
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Wolford" <jimwolford@eastlink.ca>
> To: "naturens" <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 5:54 PM
> Subject: [NatureNS] question re plurals of bird names?? (from nitpicker Jim)
>
>
>> I have just read Ken McKenna’s latest posting, as usual full of  
>> interesting stuff, but here is a question I have wanted to raise  
>> for some time now — and this will bug some of you, who should sign  
>> off now….
>>
>> In recent times, I have grown tired of trying to know when to apply  
>> an “s” to make a plural vs. “knowing” which species are best left  
>> alone when forming plural numbers.  Especially problematic are  
>> “snipe” vs. “snipes” or “woodcock” or “teal” etc. etc.  I with my  
>> “common-sense” rules of grammar have decided to just Anglicize all  
>> bird names by adding “s” or  “es” to all of them, as some of you  
>> have noted when I write “teals”, e.g.
>>
>> What say the rest of you? or does anyone care?  Is this important to anyone?
>>
>> Cheers from Jim in Wolfville.
>>



next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects