[NatureNS] short end to long again: re light

From: darrell@abolitphotos.ca
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 00:52:40 +0000
References: <28A9CAB0A45049CCA2F2F60818303183@D58WQPH1>
User-Agent: Webmail 6.0
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
     I think your average is way off Dave, go look at your meter and 
then go back in a turn a few lights on and back and look at that baby 
spin. 
   
  My guess is more like 35%
   
  Older people are hardheaded to change ;~)
   
  ============================
   
   

David & Alison Webster <dwebster@glinx.com> wrote:
Hi Patrick & All,
> Those who slogged through to the end of my last e-mail will have 
> noticed that it didn't get finished. 
>
> Based on figures issued by NS Power in 2007, power usage in the 
> average NS house was 8316 kWh/year. I estimated our power usage for 
> lights to be no more than 378 kWh/year or 4.5% of average total usage. 
>
> Unless my estimate of usage for lights is way off then the entire 
> debate about energy saved by efficient indoor lights is much ado 
> about very little. 
>
> Returning to the broader topic of systems for generation of 
> electrical power, I have the impression that Scandinavian countries, 
> Germany and Switzerland are able generally to make wise decisions 
> with respect to complex systems involving industry, government 
> responsibility, natural resources and public interest. 
>
> I wonder if they have an approach for recognition and solution of 
> problems that differs in some material way from ours. 
>
> Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville

   
   

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects