next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0164_01D04AFD.1178DFE0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Keith & All, Feb 17, 2015
Monday was largely taken up with finding if there was a car or =
woodpiles under that snow; still there but somewhat buried.
I am curious about your remark that "...shooting accidents (which =
actually do happen sometimes), "
I recall two instances, and there are no doubt many more, where men =
(not hunting) were shot in very low light conditions (both in Kings =
County). One was 6'4", stopped to empty his bowels on a railway track =
in late twilight and was mistaken for a woodchuck. Another walking =
through his orchard in late twilight was mistaken for a bear. In =
response to such accidents the legal times before sunrise and after =
sunset were shortened a few decades ago. And before that change most =
hunters, who I knew, emptied their chambers long before they legally had =
to quit.
But offhand I can not recall one instance where anyone who was not a =
member of a hunting group was shot in good light. Are there any such =
examples and if so what is the frequency in accident per hunter-hours ? =
=20
Sometimes members of a hunting group do get shot but that is a =
different matter because they are close at hand (even only 50 yards away =
the chance of being shot by a gun pointed at random is remote); people =
get tired and forget to follow common sense procedures. Greenhorns have =
been known to do silly things like squeezing a trigger to see if their =
safety is on. One hunting partner put a handfull of ammunition in a =
jacket pocket that also had a handfull of wooden matches and hours later =
one of the matches lit. Fortunately I smelled burning matches and =
alerted him. And so on.=20
Moving along to another quote=20
"I do think is absurd is to suggest that animals need to be culled by =
man. Nature can do its own culling."
While it is true that nature can do its own culling there may be =
better ways to achieve the same result.=20
Coyotes (really Coywolfs here) could contribute I suppose but (as in =
the Cape Breton instance) they would likely cull more than a few hikers =
and tourists especially when deer became less abundant. I once came =
across the scene on snow of a deer killed by several Coyotes, one day =
after it had not been there, and it was a perfect example of nature red =
in tooth and claw. A very large area covered with deer tracks, blood, =
deer hair, Coyote tracks and only a small part of one leg left. If deer =
could vote I am sure they would chose swift death by bullet or even slow =
death by a paunch shot over being torn apart apparently over a period of =
hours by Coywolfs.=20
I would suggest that in some situations, especially overstocking =
relative to the sustainable yield of the cover, it is desirable to =
reduce herd density and further suggest it is downright cruel to not =
attempt suitable herd reduction. And downright wasteful to not make use =
of any of this excellent meat, provided the tradition of how to gut a =
deer properly and how to cut it up properly is maintained. And these =
skills once lost will be regained only with great trial and error.
.
Natural culling could involve degradation of available food sources =
to the point that animals entered the winter in a weakened condition, =
forest and understory regeneration were damaged, soil degradation and =
erosion might follow and many deer would starve in average winters. Or =
they might move into residential areas, where they can not be shot, be =
fed and eventually become a pest as has increasingly been happening in =
the North East.
If there is a fork in the road where one arm leads to a field of =
positives and the other leads to a field of negatives how can one =
seriously consider the negative fork to be the better choice ?
It is way past my bedtime.
Yours truly, Dave Webster, Kentville
=20
=20
=20
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Keith Lowe=20
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca=20
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 11:24 AM
Subject: RE: [NatureNS] Nova Scotia Sunday Hunting survey
Most fear is irrational but irrigational or not the habits of many =
people and the behavior of animals is greatly effected during hunting =
season. Many people fear bears in NS even more which is even more =
irrational and unlike shooting accidents (which actually do happen =
sometimes), bear attacks don=E2=80=99t.=20
=20
Excluding duck hunters, I actually come across far more birdwatchers =
and hikers than hunters in the woods but I tend to do more =
coastal/nature reserve hiking on Sundays during hunting season and I =
know the hiking clubs do the same.=20
=20
It=E2=80=99s a matter of perspective, I don=E2=80=99t think is absurd =
to fear getting shot in the woods during hunting season but I do think =
is absurd is to suggest that animals need to be culled by man. Nature =
can do its own culling.
=20
I thought some hunters would also be against this.=20
=20
=20
From: natuns-owner@chebucto.ns.ca =
[mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] On Behalf Of =
darrell@abolitphotos.ca
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 10:27 AM
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Nova Scotia Sunday Hunting survey
=20
I am a hunter but still against it, for the reason of giving the =
animals one day free from human pressure, not for non existing hikers in =
the country side.
For perspective, many hunters only get Saturday to hunt, to pay the =
money and only get 4 days in the woods is not worth it. Too many deer =
and the herd needs to be culled.
Another reason is the natives get to hunt 7 days a week/365 and it is =
not fair that they get free rein while others do not. This bias and =
discriminatory practice has to stop. All people should be treated =
equally and fairly as not to cause tensions. The government has to stop =
the free for all harvesting by natives. All animals have a harvest =
season and limits and all people should abide by them.=20
It would be nice to see some rational thinkers in the naturalist =
community, it would go a long way.
Simply look at the shooting accidents, they are near zero, to be =
afraid to go in the woods in hunting season is down right ridiculous.
=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:50:09 -0400, Keith Lowe <mythos25@live.com> =
wrote:
I=E2=80=99m shocked the Nova Scotia government is even considering =
allowing hunting on Sundays. If you don=E2=80=99t want to lose both =
weekend days for wintertime recreation in the woods, please take a =
moment to answer these 3 questions.
=20
=20
http://novascotia.fluidsurveys.com/surveys/OSR/sunday-hunting/
=20
=20
Keith Lowe
=20
Halifax
=20
=20
=20
No virus found in this message