next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Quoting pce@accesswave.ca:
> ... but of course someone (Fred Schueler) _did_ comment on this just
> after I hit "return". Oh well.
* there's a lag in NatureNS sending out the posts - I sent mine in
before Peter's came to me,but before mine came back to me. Even e- can
cross in the mail.
fred.
==============================================================
>
> On 2015-12-24 12:35 PM, pce@accesswave.ca wrote:
>> I don't think that anyone has commented on this directly, but
>> removing "biomass" from the forest and burning it also removes
>> nutrients from the forest, thus steadily empoverishing the soil.
>> Green? Hah!
>>
>> Peter Payzant
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
Frederick W. Schueler & Aleta Karstad
Mudpuppy Night - http://pinicola.ca/mudpup1.htm
Vulnerable Watersheds - http://vulnerablewaters.blogspot.ca/
study our books - http://pinicola.ca/books/index.htm
RR#2 Bishops Mills, Ontario, Canada K0G 1T0
on the Smiths Falls Limestone Plain 44* 52'N 75* 42'W
(613)258-3107 <bckcdb at istar.ca> http://pinicola.ca/
"[The] two fundamental steps of scientific thought - the conjecture
and refutation of Popper - have little place in the usual conception
of intelligence. If something is to be dismissed as inadequate, it is
surely not Darwin [, whose] works manifest the activity of a mind
seeking for wisdom, a value which conventional philosophy has largely
abandoned." Ghiselen, 1969. Triumph of the Darwinian Method, p 237.
------------------------------------------------------------
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects