next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects
------=_Part_2398619_1994458534.1502803684875
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi everyone,
Several years ago I met a man, a citizen scientist, through the N.S. Bird S=
ociety. For many, many years he had been keeping track of owls on his prope=
rty. Does anyone know the gentleman I'm talking about and does anyone know =
how I could get in touch with him?
Thanks,Andrea
From: GayleMacLean <duartess@EastLink.ca>
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca=20
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 12:06 AM
Subject: RE: [NatureNS] insect repellents US review
=20
All...My, now retired=C2=A0vet, told me, that, when it came to Lyme Disease=
: very few dogs become seriously affected by the organism given off by the =
Black-legged Tick, BUT that a very=C2=A0HIGH percentage of people who get b=
itten by the SAME tick, =C2=A0DO become ill from it...just saying...a repel=
lant is a good thing, =C2=A0especially for families interested in exploring=
our natural province.=C2=A0Gayle MacLeanDartmouth=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0On 08/1=
4/17 11:20 PM, "Hebda, Andrew J" <Andrew.Hebda@novascotia.ca> wrote:
Hi David and Henry
I have similar experience.. Do not use any repellant.=C2=A0 Do get the odd =
mosquito and blackfly bite (in season).=C2=A0 I do not react to the bites, =
so the minor occasional inconvenience seems an acceptable trade-off, althou=
gh I know several who are affected quite badly... perhaps something on our =
metabolisms, or, perhaps we just don't let it bother us that much...=C2=A0 =
I do a tick check when I come in from the fields, but seem not to be much a=
tick magnet either.
A
________________________________________
From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca [naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] on beha=
lf of Henk Kwindt [cbatl@bellaliant.net]
Sent: August-14-17 9:37 PM
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Subject: Re: [NatureNS] insect repellents US review
I never use any repellent, although hardly a day goes by that I do not get =
into tall grass or bushes.
My neighbours have all had ticks including the black legged, but I have not=
seen any yet.
I am just too scared of the chemicals especially using them regularly.
Besides, whatever you use, you will have to check your body (totally) every=
evening anyway.
Same for sunscreen, I don=E2=80=99t use it. I am just not convinced what is=
worse, sun exposure or sunscreen on my skin.
Henk Kwindt, Cow Bay, NS.
On Aug 14, 2017, at 2:42 PM, Randy Lauff <randy.lauff@gmail.com<mailto:rand=
y.lauff@gmail.com>> wrote:
I know this goes against the grain, but have any of you tried...nothing at =
all?
I realize that there are a very few circumstances where one must go into mo=
squito-ridden areas. However, when disease transmission is effectively nil =
(as in NS), can you just not tolerate a few bites? I am now 20 years withou=
t using repellent, not even once, not on my clothes...nothing. Seriously, m=
osquito bites are itchy for a little bit, then no issue.
I really think bug repellent companies have turned this into a much bigger =
issue than it really is, and most people think they *need* repellent.
I also do not use mosquito jackets...the hoods have some redeeming value, b=
ut the jackets allow *more* access to your skin than if you just wore a lig=
ht shirt...the weave of jackets is so loose that the proboscis of the mosqu=
itoes has much less trouble getting through when compared with the tighter =
weave of shirts.
I also understand that some people are apparently more attractive to biting=
flies than other people. However, I also think that like driving (impossib=
ly, we can't all be "better than the average driver"), there are a lot of p=
eople which think that "mosquitoes just love me more than anyone else"
I do support the use of a repellent for ticks or biting insects, *if* you l=
ive in an area where disease-carrying critters are a problem.
Randy
_________________________________
RF Lauff
Way in the boonies of
Antigonish County, NS.
On 14 August 2017 at 13:34, Stephen Shaw <srshaw@dal.ca<mailto:srshaw@dal.c=
a>> wrote:
The latest (Sept 2017, page 17) print issue of US-based Consumer Reports br=
iefly evaluates 24 bug repellents, aimed at mosquitoes but saying that thei=
r tests showed that they appeared also to repel ticks.=C2=A0 The scores ran=
ge from 95 (tops), down to 4 (poor).=C2=A0 Six of the top 9 top recommended=
brands contain only DEET, 2 contain picaridin, and 1 contains Oil of lemon=
eucalyptus.=C2=A0=C2=A0 These are US-based products, unclear if all/any av=
ailable in Canada.=C2=A0=C2=A0 The report can be reviewed without a subscri=
ption at
CR.org/repellents0917<http://cr.org/repellents0917>
access to which is a bit clunky but worked for me on checking it out.=C2=A0=
The CR review doesn=E2=80=99t mention Piactive or icaridin, probably becau=
se the primary focus was on mosquito repellents.=C2=A0 The review comes dow=
n on plant-based =E2=80=98botanicals=E2=80=99, which it says are not EPA re=
gistered and which they say they found ineffective.
Steve (Hfx)
On Aug 8, 2017, at 7:03 PM, David Patriquin <davidgpatriquin@yahoo.ca<mailt=
o:davidgpatriquin@yahoo.ca>> wrote:
When I am in the "right place at the right time" to get black-legged ticks,=
especially the nymphs,=C2=A0 I use a combination of light coloured (so I c=
an see ticks),=C2=A0 pyrethroid-treated clothing and a personal insecticide=
with pyrethrin or pyrethroids (synthetic analogues of pyrethrin) to ward t=
hem off.
This summer I began using the Piactive product.=C2=A0 I was walking some cl=
earcuts in early July with a colleague who had sprayed exposed skin but had=
untreated clothing. Walking the same route, he picked up 5 black-legged ti=
ck