Glossy Buckthorn was :Re[4]: [NatureNS] Dog-strangling vine in

From: "John and Nhung" <nhungjohn@eastlink.ca>
To: <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
References: <YTXPR0101MB22886519EA353B219E4F391892850@ytxpr0101mb2288.canprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 07:35:46 -0300
Thread-index: AQIIqIos5vgz/8EKCBjLLo5GWGYJ0wGuIdmXAeyuF6cC4fWLZwFzAhAeAmcm71QCrS7/OaNQ18+w
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

&gt; &gt;Ground Zero in an abandoned industrial pa
This is a multipart message in MIME format.

--Boundary_(ID_62pbv2fX48q5rVGdhYuCKQ)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

It=E2=80=99s wise to err on the side of caution with exotics, because of =
possible displacement of native species, but  the Schlosberg=E2=80=99s =
point is a good one.

=20

Down here in Yarmouth, purple loosestrife has been present in Broad =
Brook Marsh for over twenty years.  It has persisted, in spite of early =
efforts to eradicate it.  On the other hand, there has been little, if =
any spread.

=20

On the other hand, cat-tails along the tributary draining the golf =
course are booming.  Not sure of that is due to course fertilization or =
to birdy (mainly Canada geese) do=E2=80=99s, or both, or other=E2=80=A6

=20

Fifty years ago, Japanese knotweed was considered an ornamental and =
called =E2=80=9CCanadian bamboo=E2=80=9D by some.  Not so much now.  =
Gotta start looking into how to eat that stuff=E2=80=A6

=20

Back to Broad Brook Marsh, the middle marsh is dominated by something we =
call =E2=80=9Cblack grass=E2=80=9D because of the colour of the flowers. =
 Not sure what the species is, but I have never noticed it in abundance =
anywhere else.  That could be a result of my limited powers of =
observation, but when some botanist is in the vicinity in early to =
mid-summer, it might be worth a look.

=20

From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca =
[mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] On Behalf Of Nick Hill
Sent: May 5, 2018 9:31 PM
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Subject: Re: Glossy Buckthorn was :Re[4]: [NatureNS] Dog-strangling vine =
in Nova Scotia

=20

I think this is one of the deficiencies in the way we value things. We =
are not looking to science and following through logic of testable =
hypotheses and reduced consequences. Rather we say how does CFIA regard =
this...NCC..and we don't think these are second hand positions that may =
relate to science or may relate to how things are done elsewhere or to =
our fear of the exotic

=20

There are various ecologists looking at how biological communities are =
put together and they come up with assembly rules and limiting =
dissimilarities of species...how dissimilar do spp need to be to find a =
new niche to squeeze into the community. Whether a species comes into a =
new community could be understood and every species at one stage was =
exotic to Nova Scotia. The mixing up of species will continue and the =
only way we have of maintaining the structure of biological communities =
is to maintain them and reduce the wholesale disturbance that now throws =
open a community to opportunistic species.

=20

It isn't whether a species is ours or theirs...good or bad...it's only a =
question of whether we are protecting evological processes. We have =
abandoned agriculture and two ecologically valuable rosas are filling a =
succession  gap. We are fortunate that these are here to repair our =
disturbances.=20

=20

If we doubt It, we do removal experiments to see whether things are =
better if succession had waited another decade for the arrival of a =
slower growing native species.

=20

We need to look to experiment not barcodes saying alien or native.

=20

=20

=20

=20

On Sat, May 5, 2018, 6:50 PM David&Jane Schlosberg, =
<dschlosb-g@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:

David, your posts are always interesting.  I consulted Papa Google, and =
it seems the glossy buckthorn is damned by a great many =
people=E2=80=94Nature Conservancy, Tree Canada, et al.  Could it be that =
this plant is damaging to the ecosystem in climates like Ontario, but =
not such a problem in Nova Scotia?  Your comments have helped me =
appreciate the complexity of ecology.  It=E2=80=99s worse than middle =
eastern politics. =F0=9F=98=89

=20

Jane Schlosberg

=20

From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca <naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca> On =
Behalf Of David
Sent: May 5, 2018 5:09 PM
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Subject: Glossy Buckthorn was :Re[4]: [NatureNS] Dog-strangling vine in =
Nova Scotia

=20

Hi Nick & All,

    Glossy Buckthorn IMHO  is a positive for thinned woodland; thinned =
by windfall, tree death or cutting. Provided seeds are present it =
becomes established and grows rapidly and thus captures many mobile =
nutrients which might otherwise be lost. It discourages the gross =
overstocking by Ash which otherwise become a thicket of runts. =
Buckthorn, unless held up by other shrubs typically grow lanky, flop =
over and die. The odd one survives the floppy stage and generates a =
nurse canopy for real trees which typically take longer to get =
established. My once Buckthorn thickets are now largely Buckthorn =
fragments.=20

    By arrangement I would be delighted to walk anyone interested =
through some of the patches which remain. It spreads rapidly because =
[gasp] birds mob these shrubs in season. But it does not "invade" small =
openings in the canopy so is absent or very sparse in most of my =
woodlot.=20

   =20

    Frankly I think the notion that it is undesirable is founded upon =
prejudice and nothing else.

   =20

Yt, DW, Kentville

=20

------ Original Message ------

From: "Nick Hill" <fernhillns@gmail.com>

To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca

Sent: 5/5/2018 4:37:04 PM

Subject: Re: Re[2]: [NatureNS] Dog-strangling vine in Nova Scotia

=20

Calm...i lived in southeast Kentucky

We had kudzu vine  that swallowed abandoned houses...crossex roads via =
phone lines

Scary but before we call Jesus and Mary we notice it did not enter =
intact woodland and was restricted to about 30m from the roaside.

We do have a couple of plants that are 9f concern because they do get =
into fairly intact ecosystems. I'd put glossy buckthorn at the top of =
the list and then in terms of potential for harm given reports from =
elsewhere, I'd be concerned about the spread of garlic mustard.

=20

Glossy? It's naturalized now and is part of swamps and early forest =
succession. It's not the end of the world...its green it's a laxative =
for birds and it fits into a red maple alder tudspuck sedge swamp with =
no apparent diversity or community function effects.

=20

Fight clearcutting and our inability to get any marine protected areas =
for the eastern shore because we don't want any impingement on rockweed =
harvest or oil and gas development.

=20

Great name!

=20

On Sat, May 5, 2018, 1:21 PM David, <dwebster@glinx.com> wrote:

Hi Dave P., Bev and all.
     What an unfortunate name to be saddled with. Just this side of=20
'wanted dead or alive'. I wish to add to Bev's comments about the=20
abundance of 'invasives'.
     As a general rule of thumb animals and plants eventually generate=20
conditions which threaten their well being/survival. And those which=20
prevail may do so by "invading" fresh territory which