next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects
--------=_MB97A3A7D2-A598-4DBB-807A-3981FD610751
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear All,
I still have a problem with the big bang model; a modern version of=20
"In the beginning" and wonder if there are alternative interpretations=20
of observations.
For example, sound is a wave in gas and sound can be silenced by=20
generating waves which are 90o out of phase with the incoming sound.=20
This is used in choppers e.g. so radio sounds in earphones are not=20
swamped by chopper thub thub noise.
Light has properties of a wave and the concept of the big bang and=20
an expanding universe is founded on the observation of greater red shift=20
with greater distance from the observer.
This red shift can involve light which has been traveling for=20
billions of years. Frequency of light is a function energy; waves with=20
less energy have longer wavelengths. So any very unlikely parasitic=20
interference which once in say 100,000 years might drain off a bit of=20
energy could be the source of the red shift. I understand that the most=20
remote sources, based on red shift, appear to be receding at speeds=20
greater than the speed of light. And this is a double contradiction; c=20
is the absolute speed limit and if they are speeding away faster than=20
light how could we see them ? There has to be something wrong with this=20
picture.
So combining the above, why would it not be possible for light waves=
=20
from multiple sources to infrequently interfere in ways which somehow=20
drained energy and thereby decreased wavelength of light from a given=20
source, giving rise to an apparent red shift effect ? This would happen=20
not at the source but during travel. This would superficially at least=20
fit the observations. As distance between observer and source increased=20
there would be greater opportunity for this parasitic decrease in wave=20
energy to take place.
YT,, DW, Kentville
--------=_MB97A3A7D2-A598-4DBB-807A-3981FD610751
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head><style></style>
<style id=3D"css_styles">=20
blockquote.cite { margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 10px;=
padding-right:0px; border-left: 1px solid #cccccc }
blockquote.cite2 {margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 10px;=
padding-right:0px; border-left: 1px solid #cccccc; margin-top: 3px; padding=
-top: 0px; }
a img { border: 0px; }
li[style=3D'text-align: center;'], li[style=3D'text-align: right;'] { list=
-style-position: inside;}
body { font-family: Segoe UI; font-size: 12pt; }
</style>
</head>
<body>Dear All,<div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 I still have a problem with the big bang=
model; a modern version of "In the beginning" and wonder if there are alter=
native interpretations of observations.=C2=A0</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 For e=
xample, sound is a wave in gas and sound can be silenced by generating wave=
s which are 90o out of phase with the incoming sound. This is used in chopp=
ers e.g. so radio sounds in earphones are not swamped by chopper thub thub=
noise.</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Light has properties of a wave and the conce=
pt of the big bang and an expanding universe is founded on the observation=
of greater red shift with greater distance from the observer.=C2=A0</div><d=
iv>=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0This red shift can involve light which has been=
traveling for billions of years.=C2=A0Frequency of light is a function ener=
gy; waves with less energy have longer wavelengths. So any very unlikely pa=
rasitic interference which once in say 100,000 years might drain off a bit=
of energy could be the source of the red shift. I understand that the most=
remote sources, based on red shift, appear to be receding at speeds greater =
than the speed of light. And this is a double contradiction; c is the abso=
lute speed limit and if they are speeding away faster than light how could=
we see them ? There has to be something wrong with this picture.</div><div>=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 So combining the above, why would it not be possible for ligh=
t waves from multiple sources to infrequently interfere in ways which someh=
ow drained energy and thereby decreased wavelength of light from a given so=
urce, giving rise to an apparent red shift effect ? This would happen not a=
t the source but during travel. This would superficially at least fit the o=
bservations. As distance between observer and source increased there would=
be greater opportunity for this parasitic decrease in wave energy to take p=
lace.</div><div>YT,, DW, Kentville=C2=A0</div></body></html>
--------=_MB97A3A7D2-A598-4DBB-807A-3981FD610751--
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects