sust-mar: Emera's AGM

From: "Doyle, Tim" <Tim.Doyle@freedom55financial.com>
To: "'Larry Hughes'" <lhughes2@dal.ca>,
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 06:55:11 -0400
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <sust-mar-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
A message from "Doyle, Tim" <Tim.Doyle@freedom55financial.com> to Sustainable Maritimes (sust-mar) subscribers.
As a follow up on Larry Hughes e-mail:

The state attorney general of New York is launching a lawsuit against Canada
and the province of Ontario for burning coal for energy and polluting the
air in New York.  The outcome will no doubt leave a new set of regulations
in place and could open the door for a whole new series of environmental law
challenges between both sides.

Tim Doyle

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Hughes [mailto:lhughes2@dal.ca]
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2003 9:02 AM
To: Sustainable Maritimes
Subject: sust-mar: Emera's AGM


A message from Larry Hughes <lhughes2@dal.ca> to Sustainable Maritimes
(sust-mar) subscribers.

Emera is the 'parent' company of NSPower.  They held their most recent AGM
in Halifax on 24 April. 

David Mann, president of Emera, made several interesting points:

- NSP will be installing a third wind turbine somewhere along the coast
  later this year [Blandford is what has been suggested].  Possibly > 1
  MW.

- NSP wants to have a "portfolio" of energy options [they already do, but
  this appeared to be lost on Mann].  They also want to be more "energy
  efficient" -- how is unclear [see below]. 

- NSP wants to have third-party companies/organizations generate up to 2%
  of its electricity.  They are either "looking for" or are "negotiating
  with" these parties [unclear from what Mann said at the time].
  
  The 2% is the 'limit' that will be 'imposed' by the government in its
  new energy act.  This is in keeping with our belief that NSP wants to
  avoid renewables at all costs [or live with them at minimal
  inconvenience].

- From my exchange with Mann during the shareholders' question session, it
  is clear that NSP has no interest in co-generation unless 'policy' is in
  place.  In other words, they want to be forced into adopting co-gen, at
  which point they can demand subsidies from the government.
 
  It would appear the NSP can defy the laws of thermodynamics -- Tufts
  Cove produces no waste heat according to Mann!  The argument that this
  would reduce GHG emissions and be a revenue stream for Emera was lost on
  him.

Larry.

Larry Hughes, PhD
Professor
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Dalhousie University
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3J 2X4, Canada

v: 902.494.3950
f: 902.422.7535
e: larry.hughes@dal.ca
u: http://www.dal.ca/~lhughes2

If a friend forwarded this email to you, please consider joining sust-mar
yourself. Just send 'subscribe sust-mar' to mailto:majordomo@chebucto.ca
If a friend forwarded this email to you, please consider joining sust-mar yourself. Just send 'subscribe sust-mar' to mailto:majordomo@chebucto.ca

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects