[NatureNS] Nature of science

From: John and Nhung <nhungjohn@eastlink.ca>
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:40:24 -0300
Thread-index: AcxNK+dR4VaCqFDhSpqntfZFIoIj1g==
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects


This is a multipart message in MIME format.

--Boundary_(ID_qIDprEehIuJiNV9slJoYrg)
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

To:  All

 

From:  John Sollows

 

Date: July 28/11

 

Can we all agree that honest science 

(a) considers all possibilities without bias, 

(b) realizes that qualitative information can be as important as (and
sometimes more important than) quantitative data, and 

(c) does not confuse absence of evidence for a phenomenon or an effect with
absence of the phenomenon/effect, but 

(d) acknowledges the need to test for alleged phenomena/effects, if their
importance warrants it?

 

In the case of the effects of large-scale cage culture of carnivorous fish
on ecosystems, I would bet that a bit of digging into the literature of
various sorts would raise serious concerns about the wisdom of promoting
this sort of thing.  

 

Politicians need to understand that long-term economic issues and
environmental issues coincide.  It's some short-term economic issues that
conflict with them, and the long-term costs of promoting such short-term
economic fixes often exceed the benefits.  


--Boundary_(ID_qIDprEehIuJiNV9slJoYrg)
Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" =
xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii"><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 14 =
(filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0cm;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:purple;
	text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
	{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
	{mso-style-type:export-only;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
	{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
	margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
	{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=3DEN-CA link=3Dblue =
vlink=3Dpurple><div class=3DWordSection1><p class=3DMsoNormal>To:&nbsp; =
All<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal>From:&nbsp; John Sollows<o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Date: July =
28/11<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal>Can we all agree that honest science <o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal>(a) considers all possibilities without bias, =
<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>(b) realizes that qualitative =
information can be as important as (and sometimes more important than) =
quantitative data, and <o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>(c) does not =
confuse absence of evidence for a phenomenon or an effect with absence =
of the phenomenon/effect, but <o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>(d) =
acknowledges the need to test for alleged phenomena/effects, if their =
importance warrants it?<o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>In the case =
of the effects of large-scale cage culture of carnivorous fish on =
ecosystems, I would bet that a bit of digging into the literature of =
various sorts would raise serious concerns about the wisdom of promoting =
this sort of thing.&nbsp; <o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Politicians =
need to understand that long-term economic issues and environmental =
issues coincide.&nbsp; It&#8217;s some short-term economic issues that =
conflict with them, and the long-term costs of promoting such short-term =
economic fixes often exceed the benefits.&nbsp; =
<o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>=

--Boundary_(ID_qIDprEehIuJiNV9slJoYrg)--

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects