[NatureNS] re early ice out implications? -- excellent

Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:13:45 -0400 (AST)
From: "rita.paul@ns.sympatico.ca" <rita.paul@ns.sympatico.ca>
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <9834E8EB-5D2C-424C-8820-147F7F7DA3EB@gmail.com> <2043549924.1558658.1456773395814.open-xchange@webmail.bellaliant.net> <BEDDBE97-E950-4106-93D7-635D31A4656A@eastlink.ca>
Importance: Medium
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects


<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org=
/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/1999/xht=
ml"><head>
    <meta content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUTF-8" http-equiv=3D"Content-Type=
"/>
=20
 </head><body style=3D"">
=20
  <div>
   Well in that case Jim I wouldn&#39;t
  </div>=20
  <div>
   be posting any more. You always belittle me.
  </div>=20
  <div>
   Have a miserable
  </div>=20
  <div>
   Night
  </div>=20
  <div>
   &#160;
  </div>=20
  <div>
   <br/>&#62; On February 29, 2016 at 6:11 PM Jim Wolford &#60;jimwolford@e=
astlink.ca&#62; wrote:
   <br/>&#62;=20
   <br/>&#62;=20
   <br/>&#62; Forgive me, everyone on this list, but I have held off on thi=
s for far too long. Some of you recall that I=E2=80=99m a punctuation freak=
 with what I call common-sense =E2=80=98rules=E2=80=99 about writing. Most =
or all of you once were taught basic grammar, and one rule that nobody foll=
ows any more, except yours truly, is that when you address someone, you alw=
ays set that name off with one or two commas. It=E2=80=99s a matter for wri=
ting clearly. Sorry to use Paul=E2=80=99s writing as the example, in my min=
d the point needed to be made. Let=E2=80=99s try to set examples for others=
, and why has this very sensible rule now being totally ignored? Cheers?? f=
rom Jim in Wolfville.
   <br/>&#62;=20
   <br/>&#62; On Feb 29, 2016, at 3:16 PM, rita.paul@ns.sympatico.ca wrote:
   <br/>&#62;=20
   <br/>&#62; &#62; Ice cover may not be gone yet Nancy!
   <br/>&#62; &#62; Lots of time to make ice yet
   <br/>&#62; &#62; Enjoy the nice weather while it lasts.
   <br/>&#62; &#62; Paul
   <br/>&#62; &#62;=20
   <br/>&#62; &#62;=20
   <br/>&#62; &#62; &#62; On February 29, 2016 at 2:27 PM NancyDowd &#60;na=
ncypdowd@gmail.com&#62; wrote:=20
   <br/>&#62; &#62; &#62;=20
   <br/>&#62; &#62; &#62;=20
   <br/>&#62; &#62; &#62; I have never seen the ice completely gone from L =
Torment this early:=20
   <br/>&#62; &#62; &#62; https://www.flickr.com/photos/92981528@N08/250136=
35569/in/dateposted-public/=20
   <br/>&#62; &#62; &#62;=20
   <br/>&#62; &#62; &#62; Last year it was not until the first week of May =
(the latest I ever saw- quite a flip-flop). What effect, if any, might the =
early loss of ice cover have on water chemistry, plants and animals?=20
   <br/>&#62; &#62; &#62;=20
   <br/>&#62; &#62; &#62; Nancy D=20
   <br/>&#62; &#62; &#62; E Dalhousie, Kings Co.
   <br/>&#62;=20
  </div>
=20
</body></html>

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects