next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects --Apple-Mail-FA41A71B-8120-4687-850D-B5994FE25715 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Not sure where you saw it but a person posted one on the NSBS FB page on Sun= day at Grand Pre. See post here https://www.facebook.com/groups/114204608605= 113?view=3Dpermalink&id=3D2678826448809570 It sure stands out in your photos. Personally, I have never seen nor heard o= f a leucistic (?) peep.=20 Nancy D Sent from my iPad > On Sep 19, 2018, at 12:05 PM, Rick Whitman <dendroica.caerulescens@gmail.c= om> wrote: >=20 > In the rain today, I photographed a pure white sandpiper. I can't detect a= ny pigment at all in the feathers. The legs appear to be yellow but given my= suspected ID, this also shows lack of pigment. As shown in the first photo,= this bird is as large as every Semipalmated Sandpiper around it so it canno= t be a Least Sandpiper. Given its general body size, shape, and the other bi= rds that it generally associated with, I do believe it is a Semipalmated San= dpiper.=20 > Please ignore "Buy Photo" button. I don't sell photos and there is no char= ge to view these photos full size. See last three photos at link. You may al= so enjoy the other photos here: >=20 > https://rickwhitman.smugmug.com/Nature/Birds-July-September-2018/ >=20 > Regards, > Rick Whitman --Apple-Mail-FA41A71B-8120-4687-850D-B5994FE25715 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3D= utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto">Not sure where you saw it but a person post= ed one on the NSBS FB page on Sunday at Grand Pre. See post here <a hre= f=3D"https://www.facebook.com/groups/114204608605113?view=3Dpermalink&id= =3D2678826448809570">https://www.facebook.com/groups/114204608605113?view=3D= permalink&id=3D2678826448809570</a><div><br></div><div>It sure stands ou= t in your photos. Personally, I have never seen nor heard of a leucistic (?)= peep. </div><div><br></div><div>Nancy D<br><br><div id=3D"AppleMailSig= nature">Sent from my iPad</div><div><br>On Sep 19, 2018, at 12:05 PM, Rick W= hitman <<a href=3D"mailto:dendroica.caerulescens@gmail.com">dendroica.cae= rulescens@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><d= iv><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">In the rain today, I p= hotographed a pure white sandpiper. I can't detect any pigment at all in the= feathers. The legs appear to be yellow but given my suspected ID, this also= shows lack of pigment. As shown in the first photo, this bird is as large a= s every Semipalmated Sandpiper around it so it cannot be a Least Sandpiper. G= iven its general body size, shape, and the other birds that it generally ass= ociated with, I do believe it is a Semipalmated Sandpiper. </div><= div>Please ignore "Buy Photo" button. I don't sell photos and there is no ch= arge to view these photos full size. See last three photos at link. You may a= lso enjoy the other photos here:</div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"https:/= /rickwhitman.smugmug.com/Nature/Birds-July-September-2018/">https://rickwhit= man.smugmug.com/Nature/Birds-July-September-2018/</a><br></div><div><br></di= v><div>Regards,</div><div>Rick Whitman</div></div></div> </div></blockquote></div></body></html>= --Apple-Mail-FA41A71B-8120-4687-850D-B5994FE25715--
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects