[NatureNS] A Hopeful Perspective on NS Forestry

From: Donna Crossland <dcrossland@eastlink.ca>
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <001c01d30558$065b3d20$1311b760$@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:36:25 -0300
Thread-index: AdMGVHEyPXXTk1rxQzWMZoYZqDL9BAAfyq1Q
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

	margin-bottom:.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0031_01D306CC.946BBCA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It=E2=80=99s timely to read this exchange regarding conservation =
easements and other solutions to ensure that private woodlots continue =
to house biodiversity values and ecosystem services while perhaps =
continuing to provide a modest income, or otherwise remain a working =
woodlot.  The issue of woodlot liquidation (or otherwise flattening =
woodlots) is a huge one that needs to be addressed quickly.  Woodlots =
that were carefully managed for generations are now falling to =
clearcutting practices for a variety of reasons by the next generation.  =
As we rapidly run out of Crown wood, DNR and the mills will count on =
getting wood from private land holdings (though presently private land =
wood is being froze out of the market in the southwest).  How do we =
ensure that the last bits of mature forest in the province are managed =
sustainably for a variety of purposes other than the single-minded =
interests of =E2=80=98fiber production=E2=80=99?

=20

I=E2=80=99ve been whispering in the ears of some key people, hoping that =
someone, or some organizations who have earned public trust, will =
provide some useful and very practical legal advice on conservation =
easements very soon.   Small woodlot owners, many of whom are now =
seniors, require the information now, rather than later. The obvious =
organizations we might have turned to, such as DNR, have lost public =
trust, and it would be best to obtain solid advice on conservation =
easements from elsewhere, from group(s) that will not directly profit =
from this/who are not in conflict of interest.

=20

For future generations, we need to preserve the last tiny bits of the =
old growth and intact wilderness, with sugar maples, yellow birch, red =
spruce, hemlock, and other living components of our forests.  I am =
looking into a conservation easement for my tiny woodlot.  I like the =
idea of providing some kind of lasting legacy in my will, while not =
shutting out the possibility of sensible, informed harvesting here and =
there in future generations.  I=E2=80=99d like to stipulate the =
maintenance of a shaded forest floor (protecting soil carbon, nutrients, =
mycorrhizae, and other components perhaps as yet unnamed, as part of the =
sustainable solution), but I=E2=80=99ve got some homework to do first.  =
We=E2=80=99ll have to share what we find out this fall-winter (the best =
time to do estate planning, I think).

=20

Donna Crossland

Tupperville

=20

From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca =
[mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] On Behalf Of =
plchalmers@ns.sympatico.ca
Sent: July-26-17 5:27 PM
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Subject: RE: [NatureNS] A Hopeful Perspective on NS Forestry

=20

Good points about preserving working woodland.  I have the impression =
that working farmland is better protected, but maybe that is a matter of =
local zoning?=20

 =20

I was once told about the fate of a mature sugar maple woodlot in the =
hardwood hills of Pictou County.  It had been carefully managed for =
maple syrup production for generations.  When Grandpa died, none of the =
family could take it on.  They all agreed that it should only be sold to =
someone who planned to continue the operation.  They found a buyer who =
promised to do so.  The next year, he clearcut the acreage and sold 200 =
year old sugar maples for firewood.  The granddaughter who told me this =
was alternately enraged, and teary-eyed, at the folly of it.

 =20

Aldo Leopold's style may not be to your taste, Dave, but he was an early =
voice in proposing conservation.  Have you ever read any of the essays =
of Wendell Berry?  I'd recommend his earlier collections, beginning with =
The Unsettling of America (1977) and The Gift of Good Land (1981).   The =
Library at Acadia has some of his books.

 =20

Cheers,

 =20

Patricia L. Chalmers

Halifax

 =20

 =20

On July 26, 2017 at 9:47 AM John Kearney <john.kearney@ns.sympatico.ca> =
wrote:=20

Hi Dave and all,

I agree that we need more alternatives for saving our patches of land =
for future generations.

A number of years ago, on one my birding field trips, I came upon a =
95-year old farmer working a small patch of land, surrounded by a mature =
Sugar Maple-Yellow Birch forest, in the high country of Pictou County =
with a beautiful view of the valley below. In the course of our =
conversation he expressed cynacism about what his relatives would do =
with the land when he passed away, and he lamented the fact that he knew =
of no way to ensure the protection of his lifetime of work in caring for =
the land. Today that land is part of an industrial-scale wind energy =
facility. It makes me wonder what Nova Scotia would be or could be like =
if all these patches were preserved. The choice is not between progress =
and a romantic clinging to the past as some might argue. Rather it is I =
believe, a choice between seeing the land as a commodity for our =
personal use and profit, or as a heritage, a work of art even, that we =
have a collective responsibility to care for and enhance during the time =
we dwell on the land.

John

=20

From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca =
[mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] On Behalf Of David
Sent: July-25-17 13:20
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Cc: David Webster <dwebster@glinx.com>
Subject: Re: [NatureNS] A Hopeful Perspective on NS Forestry

=20

Hi John & All,

    I suspect conservation, and nature worship, rank high in the minds =
of most private woodlot owners.=20

    I was fully disgusted with NS Nature Trust when they sniffed 'We =
don't protect that kind of woodland', when I made inquiries about =
protecting my woodlot permanently from residential/commercial =
development.=20

    If you aim to protect 12% of an area then 78% is unprotected and =
what good is a pail if 78% of the bottom is missing ?

    I never did read the second half of A Sand County Almanac, land =
ethic, because it was preachy and dry, but having read an old National =
Geographic article about Leopold, I now realize he preached conservation =
as a way of managing all landscapes.=20

Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville

=20

=20

------ Original Message ------

From: "John Kearney" < <mailto:john.kearney@ns.sympatico.ca> =
john.kearney@ns.sympatico.ca>

To:  <mailto:naturens@chebucto.ns.ca> naturens@chebucto.ns.ca

Sent: 7/25/2017 12:09:33 PM

Subject: [NatureNS] A Hopeful Perspective on NS Forestry

=20

School for Resource and Environmental Studies

MES Thesis Defence

=20

GIFTS TO A FUTURE WORLD: CONVERSATIONS WITH WOODLAND OWNERS IN NOVA =
SCOTIA

=20

By Andrew W. Kekacs

=20

Abstract:

=20

Private, non-industrial woodland owners provide more than half of the =
timber used by Nova Scotia=E2=80=99s forest products industry. Research, =
however, suggests many of these owners do not consider income from =
timber sales to be their primary reason for owning woodland. This study =
aimed to reach